National Advisory Referendum
Few would argue that our democracy is not in sorry shape with its defective and counterproductive two party scam, scores of self interested career politicians, massive and growing bureaucracy, corrosive insider and lobbyist interests, reckless policy schemes, swelling class of recipients of public funds, trillions of debt, bailouts, quantitative easing… the list goes on and on.For the individual, the current state of affairs is particularly depressing as we are continually asked to be a party to this ever growing list of insanity through the regular electoral process and through our taxes dollars yet, what difference does our participation make?
To many, elections seem a sham as both parties serve up candidates that stir little inspiration and result in “more of the same” style leadership while taxes are simply wasted on the boondoggles created by generations of policy malfeasance.
It seems that in our system there is no real method for an individual through typical civic activity to participate in real change… you are forced to simply pay your taxes and pull the lever for the least worst candidate in hopes change will come from repeating this same irrelevant process over and over again.
Further, there are many regions of the country where, through gerrymandering or other schemes, one of the two parties rules with absolute domination resulting in the complete elimination of purpose for the minority of electorate who would seek candidates in opposition.
Taken together it’s not hard to see why American’s sense of civic duty is at best lackluster.
Given these circumstances, I think now is the perfect opportunity to seriously consider either an Act of Congress or even a Constitutional Amendment to establish the purpose, right and proper procedures for a National Advisory Referendum.
A National Advisory Referendum would work at the federal level similarly to state ballot questions except for the fact that the outcome of any question would be non-binding and carry no legal change to the status quo.
In effect, a National Advisory Referendum would officially and clearly capture the “will of the people” documenting for immediate and historical purposes the state of the electorate across a range of important issues.
This process would likely work to guide legislators on important actions and stand as an important historical record especially when actions by the legislative and executive branches of our government run counter to popular public opinion.
Furthermore, popular federal ballot questions would likely work to drive voter participation as it would present a new way for voters to take part in a process outside the bounds imposed by state party dominance.
You can read more about a National Advisory Referendum by searching the net as it has been posed for various issues many times in the past and the Center for Study of Responsive Law (a Ralph Nader organization) even has a model law sketch that fleshes out some basic procedures.
Labels: economy, election, national advisory referendum
Copyright © 2013
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer



12 Comments:
You are spot on with your critique. I agree wholeheartedly. I'm not sure about your proposed remedy, though. California voters have made a mess of their state via the direct democracy of their ballot questions. I know you proposed that the referendum be non-binding, and it seems like a good idea if that could indeed remain the case, but that also seems like an easy safeguard to let slip.
By
Anonymous, at 5:05 PM
Funny, I had the same thought the other day (no title like NAR) after voting.
Why couldn't we just as citizens during a National election also voice our thoughts/feelings on important subjects of the time just to be sure that our representatives in DC hear exactly what we are thinking, concerned about.
All the polling and supposition when it would be so easy to communicate exactly what we support or do not support.
Nationalized health care? Yes or No, clear, to the point, done. Would the problem be that some/many people don't vote? Non-citizens can't vote?
Great, that's the minimum we can expect of each other for the great luck of birth (or however we have come) to be part of this great Nation.
Then let the bastards in DC go and do what they do knowing they may face the wrath of the people who allow them to do what they do if they discount or ignore our preference.
It is very weird to see your post on this. I've been voting for decades and have never had that thought before.
!
By
Anonymous, at 10:32 PM
An interesting post explaining the meaning in a clear manner.
By
transaction management realtor, at 11:21 PM
You made some good points there.I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog.Thanks
By
real estate brokers, at 1:16 AM
There is obviously so much to know about all this. You have made good points in all areas
By
real estate document management, at 1:38 AM
I appreciate the work that you have put into this page. Genuinely good,and informative. Thank You
By
real estate application, at 2:08 AM
Enjoyed reading your post. Do keep writing more.
By
real estate software, at 3:16 AM
Every new special opinion, at its starting, is precisely in a minority of one." But I am sure your thinking will have a great succes, because I like them very much
By
real estate transaction broker, at 3:34 AM
An interesting post explaining the meaning in a clear manner.
By
transaction management real estate, at 4:42 AM
This is my first time i have visited here. I found many interesting stuffs
By
Transaction management system, at 5:53 AM
I've been reading your blog off and on now for some time. Just wanted to let you know I am a regular reader of yours.
By
real estate agent software, at 6:53 AM
This is amazing like the previous one..
Thank you for this article..
By
ADP Placement Papers, at 6:51 AM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home