Paper Economy - A US Real Estate Bubble Blog

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

The FHA Meltdown!

Back in 2006 and 2007 I detailed the push by the Washington elites to “modernize” the FHA by lowering its standards effectively making it more “competitive” with the other major government and private institutions operating in the nation’s mortgage market.

Back then it appeared that FHA had become almost completely ineffective with loan insurance volume dropping over 95% in some areas in just the preceding five years.

But this drop-off was simply the result of the significant lowering of the lending standards of other public and private institutions and the sharp and artificial rise in home prices.

Stated plainly, FHA couldn’t compete because its statute simply prohibited its operation within such a distorted credit environment and inflated housing markets.

Rather than simply recognizing the obvious dangers in forcing FHA to compete in a market that was clearly undergoing a systemic meltdown the shameful Washington elites, prompted by the coming elections, self interested RPAC (Realtor Political Action Committee) initiatives, and just plain negligence, pushed forward with their efforts to “revitalize” FHA thereby “expanding American homeownership”.

As former senator Hillary Clinton explained in April of 2007, the proposed FHA modernization was a worthy cause “With the meltdown in the subprime housing market, it is clear that there needs to be a real alternative for more working families who want to achieve the dream of home ownership…”

So, the government continued to drive down standards while simultaneously pushing the populous theme of “homeownership for all” even directly in the face of epic levels of uncertainty and the obvious possibility that many new low standard loans would go almost directly into delinquency and foreclosure.

When, in January 2008, I protested legislative actions to increase of the “conforming loan limit” (affecting Fannie and Freddie as well as FHA) to as much as $730,000 Representative Barney Frank responded to my email with the following:

“With regard to the FHA, the Congressional Budget Office gives us a positive score with a comparable increase in the limit - that is they find that these loans will be repaid at an even higher rate than the other loans that fall below the old limit.”

Well, now comes news that FHA is in serious trouble as a result of significant levels of mortgage-related losses with 7.8% of their insured loans 90+ days delinquent or in default forcing its reserves to likely drop below 2% of the loans they insure, the minimum level mandated by Congress.

Some are suggesting a government bailout is on the way while HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan suggests that the chances are 50%-50%... either way this whole episode provides a nearly perfect example of how our government is simply disgraceful.

Labels: , ,

Copyright © 2013
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer

6 Comments:

  • Did you see that Frank now wants to be HUD secretary once he is done "get[ting] the federal government back in the housing business"?

    See: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/57533-barney-frank-has-eye-on-cabinet-post

    By Blogger bostonbubble, at 1:52 PM  

  • Wholly crap!

    I'm speechless... its just unbelievable.

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 2:18 PM  

  • Which part? That he wants to be HUD secretary, that he considers the federal government to not be in the housing business, or that he wants to increase its involvement even more?

    By Blogger bostonbubble, at 2:21 PM  

  • All three... especially that he wants to get the govt "back" into the housing business... this is simply shocking!

    What the hell is he talking about?!

    How MORE could the government be involved?

    The government is a complete sham ... elites like Frank are sociopaths... plain and simple.

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 3:45 PM  

  • So how exactly did they "drive down standards" vs. what they were in 2006, except by increasing their lending limits in some areas? Did they start giving away 0% loans? Did they drop their FICO eligibility threshold?

    They did not really do anything, that's the truth. FHA simply expanded by taking back the space that was previously occupied by subprime lenders. I don't see why that is wrong.

    Subprime lenders started folding in early 2007 when prices were still high. So it's inevitable that some 2007 borrowers are now upside down on their loans and some of them are walking away. That is bad. On the other hand, home prices have finally bottomed, and that is good - that would have been impossible if FHA weren't there - there are still no private lenders willing to lend above 80% LTV without some kind of gov't guarantee.

    Many of you are waiting to buy your first homes and you probably would have enjoyed another major leg down (that is, if you still had jobs by the time the bottom came), and these additional declines were obviated by the existence of FHA. In the grand scheme of things, it's better for prices to stabilize where they are. Let those who took out FHA loans in 2007 walk away or get mods. Small price to pay for economic recovery.

    By Blogger SD Scientist, at 5:01 PM  

  • SD,

    The congressional actions allowed FHA to expand its market share from 2.7% in 2006 to 23% today...

    Congress acted... they "revitalized" and "modernized" FHA and now its going to way of subprime lenders with taxpayers (... again) on the hook for the fallout.

    Do you see whats wrong now?

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 5:18 PM  

Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


 
Top Real Estate Blogs Top Real Estate Blogs Blogarama - The Blog Directory Check Google Page Rank