Showing posts with label toll brothers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label toll brothers. Show all posts

Monday, March 17, 2008

Homebuilder Blues: NAHB/Wells Fargo Home Builder Ratings March 2008

Today, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) released their Housing Market Index (HMI) showing continued evidence that the new home market is experiencing a prolonged bout of depression.

The release came along with some congratulatory back patting of the Federal Reserve for their “aggressive actions” as well as a renewed plea for government bailout of the housing debacle from Chief Economist David Seiders who now suggests that without such measures, the economy could fall into recession.

“NAHB applauds the Federal Reserve’s aggressive actions over the weekend in response to escalation of financial market pressures, and we strongly encourage the Fed to ease monetary policy substantially when the Federal Open Market Committee meets tomorrow … With the deepening problems in today’s economy and financial markets, Congress and the Administration should enact additional stimulative measures, and the next round should be directed squarely at the housing sector … A temporary home buyer tax credit, FHA modernization and GSE oversight reform are the three most important things that Congress can accomplish right now to help ensure that housing does not drag the economy into a full-blown recession. Provided that the necessary actions are taken promptly, a housing market recovery most likely would take shape by the second half of this year.”

A representatives from the NAHB made very clear to me that although the individual builder respondent rating (“good”, “fair” and “poor”) data series that are the components of the overall composite HMI series will no longer be published, the methodology has not changed.

When asked why the underlying components would not be published the representative indicated that he was simply instructed to no longer include in the breakouts in the content that gets published to the web.

It’s important to understand that each component of the NAHB housing market index is now sitting at or near the worst levels ever seen in the over 20 years the data has been being compiled.

This suggests that the current severe contraction has surpassed all other events seen in the last 22 years and is now firmly in uncharted territory.




Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Homebuilder Hoedown!


Yesterday JP Morgan held their Basics and Industrials Conference bringing together, amongst others, a host of top homebuilding executives to present their outlook for the new home business going forward.

Many homebuilders shared some particularly revealing insights in an effort to set the record straight on issues ranging from the subprime meltdown to DR Horton CEO Donald Tomnitz’s use of the word “suck”.

During the Hovnanian presentation, CEO Ara Hovnanian talked at length about current and future land purchasing as well as his take on raising interest rates.

When asked about their prospects for new land purchases, Hovnanian answered:

“I can tell you our new land purchases are down to a trickle right now, we had been looking and the reality is again, we’ve seen every cycle, the land sellers are always the last to recognize the housing slowdown and hat typically has happened is that housing prices have come down first, and the land prices ultimately come down but they’re always trailing. While prices come down and terms come down, they never come down to equal housing prices till much later in the down-cycle.

When we do new land purchases, we have to make our threshold returns at current net-net prices after all incentives and concessions and net-net absorptions after all cancellations. Today, we’re finding very very few land parcels that meet that criteria and frankly, with the market in transition and without being very stable and now with our greater focus on cash flow, I can’t say we’re anxious to go out and buy some land right now.

We have probably gone from 20,000 (properties) to less then 1,000 that we have purchased in the last six months so it’s dropped dramatically and I don’t see that changing over the next six months.”

When asked at what point mortgage rates would begin to effect buyer ability to purchase new homes, Hovnanian responded:

“It’s hard to predict that, I can just say this, prices of homes have corrected dramatically that makes all housing a lot more affordable without a doubt. The lower the mortgage rates, obviously, the more helpful it is. Psychologically, I used to say over 8% was probably the point where it starts to become more harmful, today if long rates go over 7% I just think psychologically it may be more of a barrier but we’re a ways from that right now. I think we’ve got lots of things to worry about in the homebuilding business, personally I don’t think mortgage rates are high on my radar screen of big concerns. I just think that there are other risks or factors that we’re more concerned about than interest rates.”

Listen to the entire Hovnanian presentation here.

During the Toll Brothers presentation, Fred Cooper, Senior Vice President of finance and investor relations was asked about the outlook for impairment charges resulting from land write-downs for which he responded:

“In total we’ve had about $360 million in write-downs over the last three quarters, about $250 million of it has been on owned land and then $110 million on optioned land. Generally I think more of the write-downs have come on land that is less mature where they were put under option based on stronger market assumptions. … Most of the write-downs are on land that is relatively newer and we can’t really predict what the next couple of quarters will bring in terms of write-downs but if the market, in a particular community weakens, that could tip it over the edge. It’s very hard to predict and when we gave our guidance for 2007 recently on our call we said that we’re not able to predict future write-downs at the moment.”

Listen to the entire Toll Brothers presentation here.

During the DR Horton presentation, CEO Donald J. Tomnitz provided, as usual, many candid tidbits.

Discussing the fact that DR Horton had the lowest impairments for the industry, Tommnitz stated:

“I know we have been criticized by many for not having as many impairments, it’s amazing to even get criticized for, I think, operating perhaps a better company than other. But let me tell you a couple of reasons why I think we have had fewer impairments at least then others. One is, clearly I think we are more astute land buyers. Ok, you can look at that and say “Punk, you can’t prove that” well as we move through the market we’ll find out whether I’m right or wrong. I think the second part of that is that we have never done any JVs, we have inherited JVs so as a result we have always had a policy in our company of not doing deals that are too large for us. If we had a deal that was too large, we would pass. And many of the impairments are coming from deals that people did that were too big at the time.”

When asked about the effects of the subprime meltdown, Tommitz stated:

“I believe I’m correct in saying, when I was out in Phoenix last week, FHA is in the process of, in the next 60 days you’ll see them implement some new mortgages which basically are going to include 100% loans. I have no idea why they are going there but they’re going to include 100% loans. And as a percentage overall, if you talk to all of our division presidents, the subprime, alt-a scenario has been totally overblown by the media and we don’t believe its had a significant impact on our business.

What has had a significant impact on our business and what I think it’s going to take to get the homebuilding business back clearly on its feet is that we still have excess inventory on the marketplace. We have too many homes under construction that are unsold. I think all the builders are doing a great job in terms of starting fewer homes because that’s what we need to do.”

“I was in Phoenix, the level of existing homes that have been historically on the market in Phoenix has been about 25,000 right now in Phoenix it sits around 52,000. In Las Vegas it’s supposed to be about 20,000 it sits today at about 40,000. But we’re not receiving as much direct competition, as all of you would like to believe, from existing home buyers. And why? Because the investors bought homes from us. And they typically bought them at 100% financing. So, they bought a home from us at $270,000 that same home today we may be selling for $250,000. So, there are going to have to do one of two things. They’re either going to have to keep that home and rent it for the next two to three years till the prices come back up to $270,000 or they’re going to have to sell the home for $250,000 which is what we’re selling the home for today. I don’t know about you, but you can to Mr. and Mrs. America and there aren’t many people who can take that $270,000 and sell it for $250,000 and take a $20,000 check from their bank to the title company and close the transaction. So those existing homes are going to be leased because almost all of them have 100% financing on them or a lot of them do, especially the investor loans, so we’re not really competing with that inventory.”

Later Tomnitz talked a bit about his now infamous “Suck” comment.

“One of the reasons I don’t want to interview with CNBC is that they made a big deal out of a word that, after four years in the Army, raising two teenagers, riding Harley’s and being in the homebuilding business for a number of years I had no idea the word “Suck” was a cuss word (laughter) but for any of you ah… if that bothered you and I insulted you I apologize but it just didn’t occur to me. … What I wanted to say was that the homebuilding business is going to suck for the homebuilders in 2007, but it’s going to be a windfall for the homebuyers.”

Listen to the entire DR Horton presentation here.

Monday, May 28, 2007

Gettin’ Down with Toll

Toll Brothers (NYSE:TOL) reported Q2 earnings results last week confirming a $119.7 million of pretax write-downs that served to depress their net income by an astounding 79% as compared to Q2 2006.

Additionally, Toll yet again reduced its expectation for the maximum number of homes delivered for 2007 from 7300 homes last December to 7000 in Q1 now to 6900.

During the conference call, CEO Bob Toll uncharacteristically offered very little optimistic sentiment even offering some skepticism regarding recent Treasury Secretary Paulson’s “market bottom” outlook and the recent up-tick in the Census Department’s New Home Sales.

“I think what that indicates is that most new homebuilders that are large, the public homebuilders, their average product goes anywhere from about $250K up to us which is about $700,000 so obviously the increase [in sales] is taking place below our space. Which means that we’re not out of the woods yet. I took with surprise yesterday and it’s now confirmed today by this analysis when the secretary of the treasury said that we’ve got the hard times pretty much behind us I wondered how many communities he had and where he got that information but I now understand that the information he got hadn’t been pealed away, I guess, to show that it was $150,000 housing. So I would say that we have not got the bad times behind us yet though it could be… you never know.”

When asked about the April year-over-year comparisons getting less negative Toll suggested that favorably comparing against a year that “stinks” is not what he’s looking for.

“As you get further in to a down market, in terms of length of time, the comparisons are going to get better. So that, ultimately, if we stay here for a long period of time, you will see that April sales equaled April sales last year. That’s not what we’re looking for of course. So, I think the statements are a little misleading. The comparisons are good but what you’re comparing to stinks so that’s why your getting unhappiness expressed by the public home builders.”

Ivy Zelman, analyst with Credit Suisse First Boston tweaked Bob Toll in a minor skirmish over Toll’s interest in buying additional land.

Toll: “I would hope that we would increase the land portfolio somewhat from where we are now, we are actively looking and trying to buy… We have raised thresholds because we can and I think we should operate more prudently, more carefully than we did when the market was going up.”

Ivy: “You don’t feel that having almost a 10 year supply of land is enough?”

Toll: “Well, we hope that it’s not 10 years Ivy.”

The complete conference call can be listened to here.

Here are some of the interesting data points from the Q2 release:

Second Quarter Results

  • Net income was $36.7 million down 79.0% compared to Q2 2006.
  • Pre-tax land write-downs totaled $119.7 million up 897.5% compared to Q2 2006.
  • Earnings per share declined 66.7% as compared to Q2 2006.
  • Total revenues were $1.17 billion down 18.75% compared to Q2 2006.
  • Net signed contracts were $1.17 billion down 25% compared to Q2 2006.
  • Quarter end backlog was $4.15 billion down 31.6% compared to Q2 2006.
  • Signed contracts was 2031 down 14% compared to Q2 2006.
Current 2007 Projections

  • Deliver 6100 – 6900 homes (prior estimate 6000 – 7000).

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Toll’s Dirty Dance

Ouch!

Things have not gone well for Toll Brothers (NYSE:TOL), certainly not nearly as well as CEO Bob “Dancing on the Bottom” Toll had anticipated as 2006 drew to a close.

Back then, an optimistic Toll had suggested that the housing downturn may likely have bottomed.

“Fifteen months into the current slowdown, we may be seeing a floor in some markets where deposits and traffic, although erratic from week to week, seem to be dancing on the bottom or slightly above.”

Furthermore, at that time Toll Brothers announced that they budgeted an additional $60 million to account for all pretax write-downs for the entire year of 2007, an allotment easily surpassed by the $96.9 million actually required for only the first quarter of 2007.

Now, Toll has announced an additional $90 million to $130 million in pretax write-downs for just Q2 2007!

That brings the total of pretax write downs to somewhere between $186.9 million to $226.9 million for just the first half of 2007, a truly astounding number compared to the $152 million in write-downs taken in all of 2006.

As for the dancing, Toll now suggests that things have taken a turn for the worse.

“Virginia came back… remember when I had said, either last quarter or the quarter before that that we were dancing off the bottom.. or something opaque like that, in the northern Virginia, Maryland, Washington DC market. The market continued to improve, not much but a little bit, and [now] it’s back down a little bit.”

As for additional impairment write-downs soon to come from obviously poorly purchased property such as a very large parcel Toll purchased on the outskirts of Las Vegas in January 2006, Tool responded:

“The real answer is, you haven’t reached the point where can prove to your auditors that the value isn’t there and therefore has to be written down in order to show a profit. I mean, you could argue all day that Vegas is slow and this property is going to come on the market in 09 and if things are in 09 as they are today, when we open it, we’ll be hard pressed show a profit and they’ll want to get vary exact and say ‘hard pressed quite do it’. You’ve got to show that you’re below the line.”

When asked about his outlook for the housing market in Florida, Toll replied:

“Nice place to play golf in the winter, but not a great place to sell homes right now. There are probably great opportunistic land deals in Florida, the problem is, sometimes half-price ends up to be twice-price.”

When asked if he thought there would likely be additional future reductions of “head-count” (layoffs) Toll responded:

“I prefer to call it overhead, and the answer is yes. We haven’t stopped, but we will be looking even more seriously at reducing overheads where sales paces are reduced.”

When asked to “grade” the different markets across the nation, Toll responded:

“In our northern territories, Massachusetts and Rhode Island are ‘F’. Connecticut is a ‘B+’. New York exurbs are ‘B+’, New York urban which for us is Queens, Brooklyn and Manhattan are a ‘B+’ if not an ‘A’. Jersey City and Hoboken are a ‘B+’. New Jersey suburbs, oddly enough when you juxtapose them against the New York suburbs ... you got an ‘F’, it may be due to the tax situation in New Jersey, Michigan is an ‘F’. Chicago is surprisingly still and ‘F’ market. Minnesota is a ‘C-‘ market which is a whole lot better than it was. The Philadelphia suburbs is a ‘B’ market for us. The Poconos is an ‘F’ market. The state of Delaware is a ‘C+’ market. The mid-Maryland shore, as I said earlier, is an ‘F’ market. Washington DC, northern Virginia is probably a ‘D+’ market. Raleigh is a ‘B’ market. Charlotte is a ‘B’ market. South Carolina is a ‘D’ market as in dog. Florida, central market, Orlando, we sell a lot of homes, we get the same homes back, we sell the same homes, we get the same homes back, it’s a very hard market to figure. People, I guess are renting them without ever moving in. That’s and ‘F’ market. Florida east coast is an ‘F+’ market. Florida north, Jacksonville, pretty much an ‘F+’ market. Tampa is an ‘F’. Florida on the west coast is an ‘F’. Texas is good, Austin is a ‘B’ market, Dallas and San Antonio, we’ve got a ‘C’ market because we haven’t got our product up and running as we should yet so it’s only a ‘C’ market. I suspect it’s really a ‘B’. Northern California averages to be a ‘C’ market for us, there are some pockets that are ‘B’ and some that are ‘D’. California southern market is a ‘C’ market for us. California Palm Springs is a ‘C’ market for us. Arizona … I would rate as a ‘D-‘. Vegas is definitely an ‘F’. Reno is an ‘F’. Colorado is a ‘C’.”

During the conference call, there is extensive discussion on Toll Brothers outlook for impairments as well as their methodology and criteria used to determine and take them which can be listened to in its entirety here.

Here are some of the interesting data points from today’s preliminary release:

  • Total revenue totaled $1.17 billion, down 19% as compared to Q2 2006
  • Quarter end backlog totaled $4.15 billion, down 32% as compared to Q2 2006
  • Net signed contracts totaled $1.17 billion, down 25% as compared to Q2 2006
  • Pre-tax land write-downs totaled between $90 million and $130 million
  • Q2 cancellations totaled 384 compared to 436 in Q1 2007
Remember, these results are preliminary and Ill post a more complete summary of Tolls Q2 results when they become available on May 24.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

New Residential Construction Report: March 2007

Popularly reported as an “unexpected rise” in housing starts, today’s New Residential Construction Report continues to indicate significant weakness in the nations housing markets and for residential construction.

In particular, housing permits, the report most leading of indicators, again indicates substantial weakness in future construction activity both nationally and across every reported region.

As predicted, housing completions are now declining significantly on a year-over-year basis indicating that the contraction in construction activity may soon be reflected by a substantial drop-off in construction related jobs as older projects reach completion and newer projects start at a far slower pace.

Now, we are well within the period in which permits and starts began to show significant weakness last year so the current double-digit year-over-year declines to those measures unequivocally indicate that the housing market has not yet stabilized.

Here are the statistics outlined in today’s report:

Housing Permits

Nationally

  • Single family housing permits up 1.4% from February, down 28.4% as compared to March 2006
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing up 1.3% from February, down 35.7% as compared to March 2006.
  • For the West, single family housing permits up 2.1% from February, down 22.7% as compared to March 2006.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing permits up 19.5% from February, down 29.1% as compared to March 2006.
  • For the South, single family housing permits down 3.6% from February, down 29.6% compared to March 2006.
Housing Starts

Nationally

  • Single family housing starts up 2.0% from February, down 24.6% as compared to March 2006.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing starts down 7.8% from February, down 35.2% as compared to March 2006.
  • For the West, single family housing starts down 5.9% from February, down 26.7% as compared to March 2006.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing starts up 35.9% from February, down 17.2% as compared to March 2006.
  • For the South, single family housing starts down 0.5% from February, down 24.1% as compared to March 2006.
Housing Completions

Nationally

  • Single family housing completions up 1.5% from February, down 28.9% as compared to March 2006.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing completions down 16.2% from February, down 35.8% as compared to March 2006.
  • For the West, single family housing completions up 17.8% from February, down 28.3% as compared to March 2006.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing completions up 7.6% from February, down 36.0% as compared to March 2006.
  • For the South, single family housing completions down 3.8% from February, down 25.9% as compared to March 2006.
Keep in mind that this particular report does NOT factor in the cancellations that have been widely reported to be occurring in new construction.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

New Residential Construction Report: February 2007

Popularly reported as showing a “bounce back” to housing starts, today’s New Residential Construction Report continues to indicate significant weakness in the nations housing markets and for residential construction.

Although it’s a widely held belief that the best selling season is the spring, leading some to look for signs of strength later the year, it may be that this report is showing us the best numbers we are going to see for residential construction in 2007.

As Bob Toll recently recounted, the period between January and Presidents day weekend is considered the “hot” selling season in the new home market and by his account this year was a “bust”.

“Well the Spring selling season is over, it’s a misunderstanding that we have been unable to correct over the past 40 years. In the new home business, you start selling immediately after the holidays.. it increases in number and then there’s a pretty substantial jump right after the Super Bowl because ‘she’ hasn’t been able to get ‘him’ out of the seat to go and see the product on Sunday, which is our big day, then you continue to run-up from after the Super Bowl to Presidents Day weekend… That’s the peak of the market… We have had this substantial jump from the December sales into January, we had this substantial jump from January into February but that jump cam no where near on a per-community basis to what it’s been on an average over the past 10 years.”

Today’s report shows permits and starts down high double-digits both nationally and in every region with completions now accelerating to the downside as had been widely speculated.

In fact, the report shows that completions from January as well as on a year-over-year basis are now declining in every region with particularly steep declines as compared to February 2006.

Further significant declines from here on out would unequivocally indicate that the housing market has not yet stabilized.

Here are the statistics outlined in today’s report:

Housing Permits

Nationally

  • Single family housing permits down 3.1% from January, down 32.9% as compared to February 2006
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing down 23.8% from January, down 38.9% as compared to February 2006.
  • For the West, single family housing permits up 4% from January, down 30.0% as compared to February 2006.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing permits down 16.9% from January, down 43.2% as compared to February 2006.
  • For the South, single family housing permits up 1.4% from January, down 30.3% compared to February 2006.
Housing Starts

Nationally

  • Single family housing starts up 10.3% from January, down 32.7% as compared to February 2006.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing starts down 26.0% from January, down 37.2% as compared to February 2006.
  • For the West, single family housing starts up 37.4% from January, down 35.9% as compared to February 2006.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing starts down 19.3% from January, down 52.3% as compared to February 2006.
  • For the South, single family housing starts up 16.4% from January, down 23.5% as compared to February 2006.
Housing Completions

Nationally

  • Single family housing completions down 11.3% from January, down 23.1% as compared to February 2006.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing completions down 24.1% from January, down 16.4% as compared to February 2006.
  • For the West, single family housing completions down 10.9% from January, down 38.0% as compared to February 2006.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing completions down 20.4% from January, down 36.4% as compared to February 2006.
  • For the South, single family housing completions down 6.6% from January, down 11.5% as compared to February 2006.
Keep in mind that this particular report does NOT factor in the cancellations that have been widely reported to be occurring in new construction.

Friday, March 16, 2007

Dancing with Toll

Yesterday, Toll Brothers executives were out in force, stumping simultaneously at two separate investor conferences.

First, there was the UBS US Home Building and Building Products Conference which featured several panels of home builder and product COOs and CFOs speaking about their respective companies as well as the outlook for the housing market.

In somewhat of a reversal of prior statements made by Bob Toll, Fred Cooper, Senior Vice President of Toll Brothers suggested the following regarding the effect of the sub-prime mortgage market had on housing demand:

“In 2004 2005 suddenly you had a ratcheting up of demand … so you had home price increases that were very rapid. As it turns out, in retrospect, a bunch of that home price increases were being fueled by speculators and I expect when the dust settles its going to turn out that a lot of the speculators were being fueled by the sub-prime mortgage market because they would be able to control five or six homes at a time without having to put up much capital.”

When asked about the credit quality of Toll Brothers buyers, Copper responded:

“Our buyers typically borrow just a little bit North of 70% of the purchase price of their homes so they’re not really overstretching. I would say 1% to 2% of our buyers use sub-prime and they generally use it for a bridge.. so it really wasn’t a big factor in our buyers buying ability. ”

Formally, Bob Toll made statements downplaying the effects that sub-prime mortgage lending had on their sales, suggesting that Toll Brothers buyers generally aren’t sub-prime buyers although he did note that there were quite a few investors buying Toll Brothers homes during the housing run-up.

Possibly the reality is somewhere in the middle whereby those who bought Toll Brothers homes for their primary residence generally used prime or Alt-A funding but speculating investors used sub-prime loans as Cooper suggested.

Cooper later makes the following statements:

“To say that we were wrong in 2004 2005… I don’t think we were wrong, we went from $400 million in profits to $800 million in profits and I don’t think that we would have wanted to forego those… Well I think what we missed was, I think we misjudged how impactful the speculators were.”

Listen to the entire presentation and Q&A here with Fred Cooper here.

Simultaneously, Robert Toll, CEO of Toll Brothers addressed Citigroup's Small & Mid-Cap Conference where stated that “housing is in a considerable slump”.

“Housing is a market of sub-markets and really shouldn’t be spoken about in general. Some markets are knocking them dead right now but their few and far between. Most of the markets are having a difficult time. The primary reason is the oversupply left by speculators and investors who got caught up in the mania of the price increases that were brought to the market by the extra demand created by the speculators and investors.”

Toll then goes on to play out a strange fictional scenario to demonstrate that in some markets, Toll is actually attempting to prove to buyers, with a little tough love, that there really is more demand than they think.

“somebody will come to the office and say ‘Ill take it but I need $10,000 more in incentives’… we’ll say ‘no’ and they’ll say ‘well I’m very sorry’ and they leave. Then they come back next week.. ‘how we doing…’ and we say ‘well I’m very sorry we’re doing well but we’ve had a two thousand dollar price increase and we are still maintaining the same incentives’ but we have posted a price increase because we want to show the market that we have more demand than the market believes we have and then that person will buy.”

Later, when asked to elaborate on these selective price increases during this spring selling season Toll offered this telling analysis:

“Well the Spring selling season is over, it’s a misunderstanding that we have been unable to correct over the past 40 years. In the new home business, you start selling immediately after the holidays.. it increases in number and then there’s a pretty substantial jump right after the Super Bowl because ‘she’ hasn’t been able to get ‘him’ out of the seat to go and see the product on Sunday, which is our big day, then you continue to run-up from after the Super Bowl to Presidents Day weekend… That’s the peak of the market… We have had this substantial jump from the December sales into January, we had this substantial jump from January into February but that jump cam no where near on a per-community basis to what it’s been on an average over the past 10 years.”

“As a matter of fact, it was probably as bad in traffic as a half, which is terribly down, now this is on average… the Spring selling season, or the prime selling season is pretty much a bust on a per-community basis.”

“When you stepped back and looked at it [it was] no where near where it should have been if you were looking at an average of the last 10 years.”

Then Toll goes on at length about speculators and the sub-prime market:

“By the way, speculative investors have not left the market entirely. There are still speculator investors that are now circling the market as the buzzards would on the carcass because prices have gone so far down on standing inventory that investor speculators are doing anything they can to try and get an additional incentive on that property and to buy it with as little as possible which was made possible by the idiocy of the sub-prime market until very recently. But it’s not done yet.”

“Sub-prime originators will struggle to continue to deliver sub-prime product because if they can’t they’re out of business, and before they go out of business they are just going to continue as hard as they can to be able to produce no-doc loans 100% financing… speculators eat this up.”

In a funny conclusion, Toll delivers another dancing anecdote:

“I remember in 1974 literally having to dance on top of the desk of the Third Federal CEO Mr. Greenberg who said if I got up and danced on his desk he would give me three mortgages so that I could take them and sell homes. Those were tough times… We may get there… I hope we don’t but we’re certainly not there right now.”

Listen to the entire presentation and Q&A here with Bob Toll here.


Friday, March 09, 2007

Whaler or a Yatch?

Today, Ara K. Hovnanian, CEO of Hovnanian Enterprises Inc., presented the results of Q1 2007 showing a net loss of $57.3 million.

This reflected a significant series of pretax impairment charges related to their Fort Myers-Cape Coral Florida operations which totaled $93 million.

Apparently, Hovnanian acquired land and started building in the Fort Myers area in August 05, the exact month that MLS listings in that area soared from less than 5000 to over 20,000.

The first quarter also showed a 36% cancellation rate, the highest Hovnanian has recorded since the downturn began.

Hovnanian is now projecting a decline in deliveries of 14.8% to 20.8% below the 2006 actual of 20,201 units resulting in an 8.2% to 16.4% decline to total revenue from the 2006 $6.1 billion total.

But with all this, Hovnanian, although sounding very tentative and even explicitly reiterating that he is tentative, suggests that many markets may be starting to stabilize.

“Its not getting worse and it is slow and steady.”

“To use a weather analogy, it’s not longer a monsoon but it’s been downgraded to scattered thunder showers”

Making another analogy, Hovnanian suggests that the market is possibly near a bottom with a “boat hull” shaped recovery.

“Consequently, we are optimistic that the market may be near a bottom or could achieve a bottom some time soon, perhaps near the sales pace and prices that we are experiencing. When we do find the bottom, of this market downturn we are not anticipating a V-shaped or even a U-shaped recovery rather we believe the recovery is more likely to first exhibit a prolonged period of stabilization and fairly flat performance before turning up. I visualize this projected pattern of improvement as being similar to the shape of a boat hull, moving from the stern to bow, with the stern representing a recent sudden fall-off in the market and the bow representing the ultimate recovery with a more gradual smoother shape after a flat period in between.”

“What we don’t know is whether the boat is an 18 foot Whaler or a longer sea-going yatch.”

As for the percentage of buyers using sub-prime loans in order to finance Hovnanian homes, Hovnanian reported that based on roughly 70% of transactions, 18% of fiscal 2006 and 14% of Q1 2007 were financed with sub-prime loans that were either brokered or originated by Hovnanian’s own inside mortgage company.

When asked about the 30% of transactions that wasn’t captured, Hovnanian’s CFO J. Larry Sorsby answered:

“The real answer is we don’t know for sure but it wouldn’t surprise us if that 30% was more highly weighted towards sub-prime than our 70% was but that’s just a guess, we just don’t keep that data… and you know the overall markets use of sub-prime.. I’ve seen statistics around 20% so my belief is that our use of sub-prime is not unlike the overall market.”

“If you had asked me two weeks ago, frankly we hadn’t really focused on this a great deal, we would have been working under the premise that we were 5%, 6% or 7% use of sub-prime but once actually did the analysis and got the data put together, were telling you what our mortgage company originated.”

Sorsby goes on to suggest that California has always had the most use of creative loans and that the likely outcome of tightening standards will shrink the market of buyers but that it was hard to quantify.

Ara Hovnanian the added:

“The sub-prime mortgage market has not gone away, they’ve just tightened the criteria … that clearly does shrink the pool of potential qualifying buyers but that market has not gone away.”

Additionally, it appears that Hovnanian has taken some fairly significant steps to contain costs reducing the company’s head count of the company by 20%.

Larry Sorsby suggested:

“We have already reduced head counts for the last three quarters by 20%... What we are going to do going forward is as particular markets experience slower sales we will obviously right side the organizations market by market and if they have great sales we wont have to make adjustments.. It’s a market by market situation.”

The complete audio of the conference call can be listened to here.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Breaking News… Homebuilding Sucks!

D.R Horton's Donald J. Tomnitz is hands down the greatest (or at least the most honest) CEO in history.

First he gave us the “Death Spiral” comment during his participation in last years UBS Homebuilder conference and now he’s delivered his outlook for 2007.

At today’s Citigroup Industrial Manufacturing conference, Tomnitz suggested that 2007 “is going to suck” for home builders.

When asked if he would expect the tougher markets to bring about more M&A activity Tomnitz responded:

“I think from our perspective clearly it’s a little early to be talking about M&A largely because of one good reason, as I said earlier the reason your going to buy another builder is primarily for their land and lot positions… and as we work through 07 and I’ve clearly said,… I don’t want to be too sophisticated here… but 07 is gonna suck. All twelve months of the calendar year. ”

Here's the link to the full audio of D.R. Horton's presentation. The "Suck" comment kicks in at 33:30.