Envisioning Employment: Employment Situation October 2007
In an effort to gain some further perspective on the impact the housing decline could be having on the wider economy, I have added the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) monthly Employment Situation report to the lineup of recurring posts.Ill expand the lineup of charts in future posts but for now, as a baseline, let’s look at the course that non-farm employment has taken (click for larger version) since 2003.
Also note that this chart captures four separate data-points per month.
The Monthly Initial Result is the value first published in the monthly Employment Situation report while the Monthly “Revised” result is the final revision for that month settled three months later.
The “Annual” Revised Result is published in the January Employment Situation report and revises every month in the prior year.
Finally, the “Final” Revised Result is the value currently published as part of the BLS historical data.
This is a typical routine as the BLS first publishes a monthly result, then revises it over the next two months, then revises the whole year at the beginning of the next year, and finally revises the whole historical series as underlying components are revised.
Notice that in November and December of 2006 there were two dramatic upward revisions that added nearly 1.5 million jobs and that initially the data looked very unusual.
Then in the January 2007 annual revision, the BLS revised back every month in 2006 making the discrepancy less apparent.
Finally, with the “Final” historical revision the data was revised even further making the trend line look fairly well synthesized.
The moral of the chart is only this, the monthly BLS jobs data is VERY subject to revision so use caution before drawing any conclusions one way or the other.
In future posts, I’ll continue to track the revisions as well as break out construction jobs and add other housing related analysis.
Labels: Bernanke, economy recession, employment, fed rate cut, Federal Reserve, Greenspan, housing bubble
Copyright © 2009
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer








7 Comments:
Everything looks rosie in the local market, doesn't it? :-)
Check my new comment on your "realtor follies" post . . . I didn't want that to get lost to the wind.
By
A Unique Alias, at 9:28 AM
AUA,
Yes... excellent job... I'm amazed that you found that home.
I lost track of it as it appeared to sell but now I think he simply pulled it off the market.
I'm going to do a little more research on it and then do another post...
This is just too perfect...
Great job! Thanks!
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 8:01 PM
AUA, where is the "realtor follies" post? I'd like to read your post but haven't found it yet.
By
Anonymous, at 8:47 PM
anona,
AUA was referring to my original Realtors Follies post from last year.
It went into the details of then NAR president Stevens inability to sell his own home.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 10:18 PM
That is a wicked awesome find! It's all the more hilarious because he's using Redfin to sell it rather than a traditional Realtor. They apparently can't eat their own dog food. What hypocrites.
By
Anonymous, at 3:09 PM
Sold: Happy I could find some data points that you'd get a chuckle out of. I know I laughed ;-)
Anonymous: Redfin pulls data from MLS so there is the reasonable potential that it was listed on the MLS first and was later harvested by Redfin.
At the bottom of the posting it cites that he is still using the same realtor as was mentioned in the original Washington Post article. I doubt that the realtor would want Redfin eating into the juicy commission on an $800K sale ('cuz it sure ain't gonna go for $1.25M!!)
By
A Unique Alias, at 7:19 AM
I just sold a two million dollar condo - The commish is awesome dude ; )
By
Anonymous, at 6:03 PM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home