A Closer Look at New Home Sales: October 2007
As I had noted before, in 2004 new home sales exhibited an interesting phenomena whereby the distribution of home sales, grouped by several nominal price ranges, effectively flipped from what one might conclude to be logical and from the historical norm.Prior to 2004, in general, the least expensive new homes sold the most numbers of units while the most expensive new homes sold the least numbers of units.
Not a very surprising result as one might easily conclude that the majority of new home buyers cannot, in general, afford the most expensive homes.
After 2004 though, the scenario exactly flipped in that the most expensive new homes easily outsold the least expensive homes.
Now, this could either be explained by the inflating of home prices during the boom, easy availability of bloated loans, home buying patterns, or a little bit of all of these events but no matter what the cause, it appears that the scenario is now in the process of flipping yet again.
Since the peak in 2005 new home sales have been falling among all price ranges but more recently there have been relative strength in the sales of lower priced home and a marked weakness in sales of the highest priced homes.
The interesting point here is that the “flip” that occurred in 2004 was likely an anomaly made possible by the boom which is likely to completely reverse in the coming years as the environment for home building settles back to a more historically normal scenario.
This “re-flipping” of new home sales may serve as a good indicator of the unwinding of the boom.
The first chart shows new home sales for the highest priced new homes, i.e. homes priced above $300,000 (click for larger version). Notice that since 2005 sales have been declining sharply.
Labels: economy recession, Fed Discount Rate, fed rate cut, Federal Reserve, housing bubble, new home sales
Copyright © 2009
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer








3 Comments:
I've always gauged it in an intuitive-type way, seeing it as a relay race.
Throughout the boom, first time homebuyers would run up to second-time homeowners in an upgraded place, and "pass the baton" as it were. This would roll forward up the chain.
There is a point at which people cannot afford starter houses, though, and sales start dropping off.
In the grand relay race, there are still people running legs of the competition way far ahead, still blissfully unaware of the bust, handing off their batons as demand still exists.
But without people to bring the baton at the very start, the rest of the system eventually starves and there's nothing to pass.
By
aua, at 12:38 PM
AUA,
Exactly... This is precisely what the home builders like Toll Brothers have been seeing.
Initially, they shrugged off the sub-prime crisis because so few of their homes were purchased with sub-prime loans.
But then they found out that without the trade-up market, they are essentially dead in the water.
Now add to that the sub-prime is just a tip of the iceberg...
All markets are now under pressure with all "homeowners" failing at higher than historic norms resulting in the entire market unwinding.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 2:10 PM
great comments...... aua
If you one step deeper....you can now find the real key and that is not that first times can't buy...buy why should they ??? Where I live you can rent a starter home (250k) for $1000-$1200 a month...why on earth would you buy....when smart people know prices will not go up anymore for years....
By
Anonymous, at 3:52 PM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home