Paper Economy - A US Real Estate Bubble Blog

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Socializing The Loss: Carrying To and Fro

Here’s another beauty…

Not to be left out of the fun of robbing "Main Street" (middleclass taxpayers and everyone else) blind to bailout Wall Street, the IRS today announced that it will change (and/or not enforce) regulations to allow Wall Street finance and mortgage lending firms to count losses on delinquent mortgages (or foreclosed and all other mortgage losses) against their ordinary income.

Better still, this change fits perfectly with recent legislation proposed in the Senate that would expand “carry back” and “carry forward” rules to allow these losses to be “carried back” as much as four years, meaning the losses could be applied against regular income for any of the last four tax years and also “carried forward” to future tax years.

So effective immediately Wall Street lending and other financial firms, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, can seek refunds for these losses going back two years and, if the Senate bill is approved and passed as law, an additional two years.

Here’s my favorite quote from the Bloomberg piece that noted that to date, 70 of the world's biggest banks, securities firms and mortgage companies have taken about $290 billion in asset write-downs and credit losses since the beginning of 2007:

``This is a serious windfall,'' said Christopher Whalen, managing director of Hawthorne, California-based Institutional Risk Analytics. ``Essentially, the Street gets a $290 billion tax shelter they did not have available'' under the earlier IRS position.

Labels: , , ,

Copyright © 2009
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer

6 Comments:

  • Competence is out and corruption is in. Just like in the USSR.

    By Anonymous Dagger, at 1:44 PM  

  • #1: That image looks like an eagle in a bikini.

    #2: You have got to be absolutely totally kidding me. Can foreclosed FBs write off the value of the home from their prior-year and future-year taxes? Or are they just effed? This is true insanity.

    By Anonymous AUA, at 2:01 PM  

  • It really is atrocious... total incompetence is being rewarded to the tune of (for now) $290 Billion!!

    I can't imagine why this would be allowed to happen.

    Funny it didn't make much press today as it is a HUGE deal...

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 2:12 PM  

  • Maybe I'm missing something, why wouldn't a business be able to balance losses against income? Seems pretty reasonable to me.

    By Blogger shamrock, at 8:11 AM  

  • Shamrock,

    Well the IRS issue was a simple assertion that MBS (and I suppose other mortgage related structures) are capital assets (like all other financial assets) in which case their losses could only be counted against capital gain but not against ordinary income.

    MBS are clearly capital assets so the whole thing is just a sham they (the IRS) are simply buckling to pressure.

    The other issue is the senate bill would extend the "carry back" to 4 years.

    This is just a vehicle to allow Wall Street to massage their losses and its main street (generations of them) that is picking up the tab.

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 8:27 AM  

  • OK. Aggressive lending to people with spotty credit led to record foreclosures, which imperiled investment houses and froze credit, the lifeblood of the economy. The upshot for people trying to make sense of it all: plummeting stock values, rising unemployment, shrinking confidence.

    Now, what if the government gave those people with spotty credit enough money to 1) pay off those mortgages, or 2) refinance their mortgages to manageable rates, or 3) bought those houses and resold them at a discount to those same buyers or others?

    Would that cost more than the trillion-dollar bailout of financial companies that will do WHAT with the money? Or would that be so socialistic that even liberals such as I couldn't swallow it?

    Or, and this is really dramatic, what if we actually paid people salaries that allowed them to buy homes, finance them at true market rates, and raise their children and pay taxes to support all the services they need for the pursuit of happiness?

    I don't care about "golden parachutes" for a couple of fat cats. I do care about giving a few nonelected people, the Fed chairman, the treasury secretary and/or the Securities and Exchange Commission chairman total control of our economy, a reputed free market.
    Mike Bray

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:57 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


 
Top Real Estate Blogs Top Real Estate Blogs Blogarama - The Blog Directory Check Google Page Rank