S&P/Case-Shiller: May 2008
Today’s release of the S&P/Case-Shiller home price indices for May continues to reflect the extraordinary weakness seen in the nation’s housing markets with now ALL 20 of the 20 metro areas tracked reporting year-over-year declines and ALL metro areas showing substantial declines from their respective peaks.Readers should take a moment to carefully reflect on the charts below as this level of price decline occurring simultaneously across the whole of the U.S. is not only unprecedented but is probably the purest expression of the fundamental collapse of wealth and well being for our nations typical home owning household.
The 10 city composite index declined a record 16.88% as compared to May 2007 far surpassing the all prior year-over-year decline records firmly placing the current decline in uncharted territory in terms of relative intensity.
This report indicates that we have now firmly entered the serious price “free-fall” phase (look at the charts below) of the housing bust.
Topping the list of peak decliners was Las Vegas at -31.41%, Miami at -31.22%, Phoenix at -30.82%, San Diego at -28.88%, Los Angeles at -27.51%, Detroit at -27.11%, Tampa at -25.60%, San Francisco at -25.49%, Washington DC at -20.65%, Minneapolis at -18.12% and Boston at -12.11%
Additionally, both of the broad composite indices showed accelerating declines slumping -19.80% for the 10 city national index and 18.39% for the 20 city national index on a peak comparison basis.
To better visualize the results use the PaperEconomy S&P/Case-Shiller/Futures Charting Tool as well as the PaperEconomy Home Value Calculator and be sure to read the Tutorial in order to best understand how best to utilize the tool.
The following chart (click for larger version) shows the percent change to single family home prices given by the Case-Shiller Indices as compared to each metros respective price peak set between 2005 and 2007.
To create the following annual charts I simply aligned the CSI data from the last month of positive year-over-year gains for both the current decline and the 90s housing bust and plotted the data with side-by-side columns (click for larger version).
Looking at the actual index values normalized and compared from the respective peaks, you can see that we are only eighteen months into a decline that, last cycle, lasted for roughly fifty four months during the last cycle (click the following chart for larger version).
As you can see the last downturn lasted 97 months (over 8 years) peak to peak including roughly 43 months of annual price declines during the heart of the downturn.
Notice that peak declines have been FAR more significant to date and, keeping in mind that our current run-up was many times more magnificent than the 80s-90s run-up, it is not inconceivable that current decline will run deeper and last longer.
Labels: case shiller, economy recession, home prices, housing bubble
Copyright © 2013
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer



11 Comments:
A more managable presentation may be one that compares the affordability of housing during each of these bottoming markets.
As shown here, when you set your base point at the high, the percentage decline looks awful, but shows almost nothing about the relative cost of housing to the income of owners/buyers.
Better questions: did the 1981 slump or the 1992 slump make homes "cheap"? Has the current market made housing cheap? I have my guesses, but you've the better numbers...
By
no frog speak, at 6:46 AM
Did anyone hear Carl Case on WBUR this morning, arguing that we are at or near the bottom of the bust because prises rose 0.1 percent and 1.0 percent, respectively, in April and May?
I practically spit out my cereal. I was infuriated that the interviewer did not call him on his bullshit. Probably because she didn't know the subject matter, she failed to point out that prices rose last spring, too, before resuming their decline in the fall.
By
Dan Eisner, at 10:38 AM
Just to echo Dan Eisner, I read an NYT article a few days ago that said the same thing -- that prices in Boston rose slightly in May. No mention of seasonal fluctuation.
That article also pointed out the rate of decline seems to be slowing. It's pretty grim when that's considered good news. Even in free fall you eventually reach terminal velocity.
By
Dagger, at 11:13 AM
It'd be interesting to know how far back prices have rolled. A statement like *"the bubble started in 2002, peaked in the summer of 2006, and now we've rolled back to January 2005, and to get back to the start of the bubble prices need to drop another 20%"*. I'm just pulling that out of the air so don't quote me.
Also your graphs show the last bubble-pop started with free-fall, followed by a long period of bumpy up/down. There are hints that we might be seeing the end of the current free-fall. After that we can look forward to 10 years of bumpy as inflation and smaller declines take care of the rest of this bubble.
By
Dagger, at 11:32 AM
WTF with Chip Case? On WBUR this morning he sounds like he's channeling the David Lereah or Nicholas Retsinas of old, calling a bottom this year because of ... wait for it ... two M2M statistical upticks in MA(!) Never mind the insolvent banks, lenders, recession, MA housing prices in real terms still way above historical norms, high inventories, and the normal years-long process for massive economic bubbles to correct. There will be a bottom sometime, but I haven't heard any bottom caller for the past 18 months, Case included, provide any compelling reasons. Just more whistling in the dark. Is Case the good cop to Shiller's bad cop, or vice-versa?
By
Anonymous, at 12:00 PM
I think you're making the release out to be far worse than it really was.
Bottom line is that the month over month for many metros was positive and the best delta over the past couple of years.
There's no disputing the trend is still down. But last month can't be entirely dispelled.
By
Anonymous, at 12:44 PM
Second anonymous:
Here's a baseball analogy. Let's say the awful Washington Nationals have a 10-game stretch in which they win eight games. Would this give people reason to believe the Nationals had turned their season around? No.
Regardless of that successful stretch, the fundamentals would still indicate that the Nationals would finish the season with one of the worst records in baseball: their pitching is awful and their hitting dreadful. It's the same way with the Boston housing market; the fundamentals (see the comment by the first anonymous) indicate that prices will still fall significantly.
By
Dan Eisner, at 1:18 PM
I appreciate the analogy but I don't think it's directly applicable -- the housing market isn't a baseball team.
If I had a stock that dropped 50%, there's no reason to think that it's more or less likely to drop another 25% according to most beliefs.
The stock analogy isn't entirely valid either.
I wasn't by any means saying the downtrend has ended - I think I was pretty clear about that. If there is another uptick in prices next month (month-over-month) I don't think unreasonable to think that there may be some sort of a bottom forming. Do I think that'll happen? I wouldn't be suprised either way.
By
Anonymous, at 1:44 PM
No Frog Speak,
That sounds like a good idea... I will try to whip something up.
Dan and anon,
I'm going to see if I can find the segment up at NPR.org.
I have hear Professor Case speak about the housing decline and have read one of his papers published recently and I have to say, in general his appears more of an optimist than a reincarnation of David Lereah.
I think he may have been simply taking the position of someone who is somewhat hopeful that the decline will abate and not wreck the economy... that is how his other appearances have come off to me.
Even Shiller last year appeared on Bloomberg and cited the longer than usual spring price rise in Boston as a possible sign that a bottom had been reached.
I think it is very hard to develop the outlook that we have (i.e. things are going to hell in a hand basket) and also it may simply be human, even for skeptics, to appear hopeful at times.
Dagger,
BostonBubble.com publishes a great inflation adjusted Boston price index which shows that, in real terms, we are back to 2002 but I suppose in nominal terms we are getting close to 2004.
My sense is that it is altogether possible that prices may bottom out at somewhere around the 1999 or 2000 level.
It may take a while and will require another shock (jobs, fannie freddie implode) but I believe it may actually happen.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 3:11 PM
Interesting article , you make some interesting points.
Mortgages directory
By
Mortgages, at 3:42 AM
In the UK I think the tide has turned an the propert bubble is about to collapse.
By
financial spread betting, at 1:31 AM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home