NARcasting The Future: February 2009
This week, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) provided their latest estimate of annual existing home sales for 2009 again revising down their 2009 total year sales forecast to 5.11 million units.As usual, the latest forecast comes with another dose of truly ridiculous spin.
In an effort to put their absurd bias into perspective I compiled all their existing home sales forecasts for 2007, 2008 and now 2009 into a chart along with a list of prominent quotes supplied with each forecast.
12/11/2006 Prediction: 6.40 million units.Lereah "Most of the correction in home prices is behind us."
1/10/2007 Prediction: 6.42 million units.
Lereah "The good news is that the steady improvement in sales will support price appreciation moving forward."
2/7/2007 Prediction: 6.44 million units.
Lereah "After reaching what appears to be the bottom in the fourth quarter of 2006, we expect existing-home sales to gradually rise all this year and well into 2008."
3/13/2007 Prediction: 6.42 million units.
Lereah "Although existing-home sales will be marginally reduced due to subprime lending restrictions, they should be gradually rising this year and next."
4/11/2007 Prediction: 6.34 million units.
Lereah "Tighter lending standards will dampen home sales a bit, but by less than a couple of percentage points from initial projections."
4/30/2007 Lereah Leaves NAR for Move.com
5/9/2007 Prediction: 6.29 million units.
Yun "Housing activity this year will be somewhat lower than in earlier forecasts."
6/6/2007 Prediction: 6.18 million units.
Yun "Home sales will probably fluctuate in a narrow range in the short run, but gradually trend upward with improving activity by the end of the year."
7/11/2007 Prediction: 6.11 million units.
Yun "Home prices are expected to recover in 2008 with existing-home sales picking up late this year."
8/8/2007 Prediction: 6.04 million units.
Yun “With the population growing, the demand for homes isn’t going away – it’s just being delayed.”
9/11/2007 Prediction: 5.92 million units.
Yun “Patient buyers in most areas who do their homework will recognize that housing remains a good long-term investment.”
10/10/2007 Prediction: 5.78 million units.
Yun "The speculative excesses have been removed from the market and home sales are returning to fundamentally healthy levels, while prices remain near record highs, reflecting favorable mortgage rates and positive job gains."
11/13/2007 Prediction: 5.5 million units.
Yun "In some ways, the extended real estate boom from 2001 to 2005 created unrealistic expectations that housing is a short-term high-yield investment… 2007 will be the fifth best year for housing on record"
12/10/2007 Prediction: 5.67 million units in 2007, 5.7 million units in 2008.
Yun "The broad trend over the coming year will be a gradual rise in existing-home sales, but because sales are exceptionally low in the final months of 2007, total sales for 2008 will be only modestly higher than 2007."
ACTUAL: 5.652 million existing units sold in 2007
01/08/2008 Prediction: 5.66 million units in 2007, 5.7 million units in 2008.
Yun "A meaningful recovery in existing-home sales could occur as early as this spring, or it may be further delayed toward late 2008."
02/07/2008 Prediction: 5.38 million units full year.
Yun "Where builders have cut construction sharply, and in most areas with improving affordability conditions, we’ll generally see moderately higher home prices."
03/06/2008 Prediction: 5.38 million units full year.
Yun "Significant price declines in some local markets have sharply and quickly improved local affordability conditions, and are inducing buyers to return to the marketplace"
04/08/2008 Prediction: 5.39 million units full year.
Yun "Exceptionally weak home sales related to jumbo loans problems will depress home prices in the first half of the year, but steady liquidity improvements in the conforming jumbo-loan market will help prices recover in the second half of the year"
05/08/2008 Prediction: 5.39 million units full year.
Yun "Although more than half of local markets are expected to see price growth this year, the aggregate existing-home price will decline 2.4 percent in 2008, driven by a relatively few markets that are very oversupplied"
06/09/2008 Prediction 5.4 million units full year.
Yun "We’re seeing healthy price gains in moderately priced areas like Erie, Pa., and Corpus Christi, Texas, and double-digit gains in others"
07/08/2008 Prediction 5.31 million units full year.
Yun "Interestingly, there have been reports of multiple bidding after the large price cuts, so it is possible that most of the price declines have already occurred in those markets."
08/08/2008 Prediction 5.51 million units full year.
Gaylord "buyers [will] get into the market to take advantage of the unprecedented drop in home prices in many areas, as well as a wide selection of inventory, to make an investment in their future,"
09/09/2008 Prediction 5.01 million units full year.
Yun "Nationally, home sales are stable now but are expected to increase in coming quarters."
10/08/2008 Prediction 5.04 million units full year.
Yun "What we’re seeing is the momentum of people taking advantage of low home prices…"
11/07/2008 Prediction 5.02 million units full year.
Yun "…we’re still in a broad period of stabilization"
12/09/2008 Prediction 4.96 million units full year.
Yun "Given the critical role of housing in an economic recovery, we’re confident sufficient (government) stimulus will be offered to bring more buyers to the market,"
ACTUAL: 4.912 million existing units sold in 2008
1/06/2009 Prediction 4.90 million units in 2008, 5.224 million units 2009.
Yun "With a proper real-estate focused (government) stimulus measure, home sales could rise more than expected, by more than 10 percent..."
2/02/2009 Prediction 4.912 million units in 2008, 5.116 million units 2009.
Yun "Forecasting is a hazardous sport at times. With so many pieces of the puzzle now moving in opposite directions, the crystal ball reading has become even cloudier."
Labels: existing home sales, forecast, NAR, narcast, national association of realtors
Copyright © 2013
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer



10 Comments:
Do these numbers include foreclosure sales? Do real estate agents get commission on foreclosure sales?
By
Dagger, at 1:52 PM
Dagger,
I'm no expert on foreclosure sales but I have seen that most foreclosed/distressed homes in my area are simply listed on the MLS.
You can find most the the REOs and most of the really early distressed properties (NODs and just issued Foreclosure Deeds) on the MLS as well so I suppose that MLS does capture many of the foreclosure sales and that Realtors get commission on these sales.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 2:13 PM
Thanks. I guess the bank that's foreclosing gets to decide what to do. Maybe some of them negotiate a lower commission. Or maybe they figure the service is worth the price.
By
Dagger, at 3:51 PM
At what point does the NAR's rhetoric pass from propaganda to fraud? Lereah and Yun are guilty of lying and cheating the public and the banks. Given the magnitude of the disaster they have created, I believe that they are guilty of treason against the nation. Since we are presently at war (The War on Terror and Human
Rights), they should be taken out and shot after a quick trial involving lots of waterboarding (not because we want answers, but because we owe it to them).
By
Expat, at 3:39 AM
Expat,
I agree... I don't think that people yet generally understand the contributions that were made by NAR to inflating the bubble.
Some day I suppose that it will be clearly obvious to anyone (not just bubbleheads) the extent to which the NAR marketed homeownership and the assets class of residential real estate...then, possibly, they will appear a lot more like Madoff then like a simple industry group.
Hopefully our country will then be angry enough to reign in some of their privileges (strip them of MLS and data gathering and reporting) and pursue SEC fraud actions.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 8:17 AM
At what point does the NAR's rhetoric pass from propaganda to fraud?
I guess it's lucky for them that they always include the disclaimer that "past performance is no guarantee of future results." Oh wait, no they don't. That's funny - those soliciting for legitimate investment vehicles always include such a disclaimer. I wonder what precedent prompted the prevalence of this disclaimer elsewhere and whether it could be applied here.
By
bostonbubble, at 8:57 AM
Hype made me do it!
Come on, there is a good argument for statistics being evaluated before the media runs with them regardless of their origin but, MLS stats and hype is why people acted like lemmings?
Do you own a chest full of gold right now?
Are you buying up stocks like crazy? No? Why not?
Hype by MLS is hype by MLS and anyone who uses that as an excuse for frantically buying Real Estate priced far above their ability to pay is just looking for a scapegoat.
To stay a free Nation we have to be sure to take responsibility for our own actions. Period.
We could all just run around and claim that the devil made us do it, what ever IT may be. Would that make anything better?
It would be great to have a media that did some homework though.
Have to agree with you there.
!
By
Anonymous, at 10:30 AM
MLS stats and hype is why people acted like lemmings?
Absolutely, the NAR's propaganda was one factor. You're saying it wasn't? You talk about taking responsibility for your own actions, and I definitely agree. People need to take responsibility for their own actions even if they were mislead (because the misleading source in this case was obviously biased). By the exact same token, the NAR needs to take responsibility for the lies they have propagated.
By
bostonbubble, at 11:05 AM
BostonBubble is exactly right... the NAR took advantage of and pumped the absurd enthusiasm for residential real estate and they need to pay for it.
You need to understand that there is almost no difference between Madoff scheme (or any other ponzi-scheme for that matter) and the NAR housing scheme...its all the same... they were simply in it for commission.
It's important to remember that we are NOT strictly an absolute "buyer beware" society... we have laws and rules for a reason... there are limits.
I'm all in favor of personal responsibility but there has to be a balance because we know as a matter of fact that tens of millions of people can be driven into a collective speculative delusion if the conditions are right.
You can live by the sword if you like but its unfair that we are all dying by the sword for the actions of the raltors, banks, mortgage brokers and millions of halfwit home "owners" and speculators.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 11:40 AM
Real estate agents are like stock brokers. Salesmen, driven by commissions, selling an investment. A house is usually more than just an investment, but the "investment" part is usually a big part of the pitch.
And with real estate you are buying your investment with borrowed money, leveraging up.
Since we regulate stock brokers, it seems reasonable to do the same with real estate agents.
And since we require a lot of disclosure from brokerages, the same thing could apply to real estate organizations. Information should be public.
In an ideal world, people are rational and careful and can look out for themselves. These laws are an admission that people are stupid sometimes.
Of course, maybe the cure is worse than the disease. I dunno.
By
Dagger, at 1:26 PM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home