Showing posts with label home sales. Show all posts
Showing posts with label home sales. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

New Home Sales: March 2014

Today, the U.S. Census Department released its monthly New Residential Home Sales Report for March showing a notable decline with sales falling a whopping 14.5% from February dropping 13.3% below the level seen in March 2013 and remaining at an historically low level of 384K SAAR units.

The monthly supply increased to 6.0 months (considered fairly balanced between buyers and sellers) while the median selling price jumped 12.62% and the average selling price increased 11.33% from the year ago level.

The following chart show the extent of sales decline to date (click for full-larger version).

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Pending Home Sales: March 2012

Today, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) released their Pending Home Sales Report for March showing that pending home sales improved notably with the seasonally adjusted national index climbing 4.1% since February while increasing 12.8% above the level seen in March 2011.

Meanwhile, the NARs chief economist Lawrence Yun suggests that, based on the current trends, 2012 could see the best selling in five years.

"The spring home buying season looks bright because of an elevated level of contract offers so far this year, ... If activity is sustained near present levels, existing-home sales will see their best performance in five years. Based on all of the factors in the current market, that’s what we’re expecting with sales rising 7 to 10 percent in 2012."

The problem is though, the MBA Purchase Index is not currently capturing any significant rise in purchase contract activity which begs the question... how are the buyers that the NAR sees in the pending index financing their purchase? ... Cash?

The following chart shows the seasonally adjusted national pending home sales index along with the percent change on a year-over-year basis as well as the percent change from the peak set in 2005 (click for larger version).

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Beantown Bust: Boston Home Sales and Prices January 2011

Recently the Massachusetts Association of Realtors (MAR) released their Existing Home Sales Report for January showing that single family homes sales declined 32.4% from December but increased 13.1% above the level seen in January 2010 with detached single family median home prices falling 5.2% below the level seen last year.

Condo sales, on the other hand, declined on both a monthly and annual basis dropping 35% from December and 5.2% from January 2010 while median selling prices declined 3.9% below the level seen a year earlier.

The S&P/Case-Shiller (CSI) Boston index indicated that area single family home prices declined 0.14% between November and December 2010 and registering a year-over-year decline of 0.81%, the third consecutive annual decline.

As for condos, the Boston condo CSI indicated area unit values declined 0.75% between November and December 2010 with values showing a year-over-year decline of 1.20%.

Single family home inventory rose 4% over the level seen in January 2010 with the monthly supply sitting at a whopping 11 months while condo inventory declined 5% but showed an even worse 11.1 months of supply.

Single family homes stayed on the market for an average of 143 days while condos stayed an average of 151 days, both values significantly higher than the level seen last year indicating that the sales pace is continuing to slide.

As in months past, be on the lookout for the inflation adjusted charts produced by BostonBubble.com for an even more accurate "real" view of the current home price movement.



Tuesday, June 01, 2010

New and “Organic” Existing Home Sales Agree


As I have noted in prior posts, the S&P/Case-Shiller sale pair counts series are, to my knowledge, the best “organic” existing home sales series as can be found.

The methodology employed by S&P vets out “flips”, new construction and even most distressed sales providing them with a solid base of true “arms-length” sales for which to base their more popular home prices series on.

As has been widely reported, some 30%-40% of all existing sales (as reported by the NAR) are distressed properties resulting in a significant gap between the trends in new and existing home sales.

Existing home sales have been essentially propped up by the high volume of distressed properties resulting in a poor indicator of the true trends for non-distressed typical existing home sales.

Yet, looking at the chart (click for super dynamic full-screen version) which compares the seasonally adjusted new home sales series and the non-seasonally adjusted S&P/Case-Shiller Composit-10 sale pair count series, both smoothed with a 12 month simple moving average, you can see that there is a great degree of correlation between the two trends.

Further, although both series clearly indicate that the worst of the home sales decline is likely behind us, it’s important to recognize that the formation of the “bottom” during the 90s-era housing bust took roughly two years during which time existing home sales continued to slowly trend down.

A bottom to our current housing cycle will not be defined by a single data series on a single month but instead will be a long slow slog whereby multiple market factors clear in a cumbersome "fits and starts" manner.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Existing Home Sales Report: November 2009

Today, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) released their Existing Home Sales Report for November showing a continuation of the epic government sponsored surge in home sales activity particularly for condos and lower end properties.

In fact, the stimulative effects have been so pronounced that sales of single family homes were up over 42% annually while sales of condos jumped a whopping 60% over the same period.

As for prices, they are still declining with single family home prices declining at 4.4% annual rate while condos declined at a 3.1% annual rate.

It’s important when reflecting on the sales results to consider that over 70% of all sales were for properties priced below $250,000 while only 7.3% were priced at or above $500,000.

Clearly, today’s results unequivocally indicate that the government’s tax gimmick drove a surge in "lemming" demand, bringing a renewal of speculative animal spirits but the cost has been high with at least $500 million of outright fraud and an FHA that is on the rocks.

So, while the federal government works tirelessly to prop unaffordable housing prices, Realtors are quickly lining their pockets with commissions that are a direct result of American's current and future tax dollars.

The following (click for larger versions) are charts showing sales for single family homes, plotted monthly, for 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 as well as national existing home inventory and month supply.







Below is a chart consolidating all the year-over-year changes reported by NAR in their most recent report.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Existing Home Sales Report: May 2009

Today, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) released their Existing Home Sales Report for May indicating that home sales declining slightly on a year-over-year basis, despite the significant slide to median selling prices, record low interest rates and significant numbers of speculative sales of distressed properties in the western region.

Existing single family home sales were down 2.97% on a year-over-year basis while the median selling price declined a dramatic 16.07% over the same period.

More notably though, the Condos now seem to have fully tipped into the major decline phase with sales declining 8.9% on a year-over-year basis with median selling prices declining a whopping 21.9% over the same period.

Lastly, the West region, which had since the summer of 2008 looked to be experiencing a market clearing of sorts with surging (mostly distressed) home sales coming on the back of record price declines, is now starting to show some clear signs that it’s housing rally may be drawing to a close.

With the selling price of all housing products continuing to fall at an annual rate of over 30% and regional unemployment near 12% this massive “suckers rally” in residential real estate will deal the West region another serious financial blow.

The NAR leadership continues their truly disgusting and shameless spin with both their chief economist Lawrence Yun and their current president Charles McMillan suggesting that “poor appraisals” are forestalling a “housing recovery”…. For those of you that don’t recognize it… this talk is the simple framing of an appeal (through RPAC the Realtor political action committee) for action from the federal government to contrive the procedures used to conduct fair-market appraisals of residential real estate…

“First-time buyers also are being drawn off the sidelines by the $8,000 tax credit, which is helping to absorb inventory. However, the increase in sales is less than expected because poor appraisals are stalling transactions. Pending home sales indicated much stronger activity, but some contracts are falling through from faulty valuations that keep buyers from getting a loan.” Yun said.

“To maximize the potential for a housing recovery and subsequent economic recovery, we need realistic appraisals that are based on proper comparisons and done by a local specialist,” McMillan said.

The following (click for larger versions) are charts showing sales for single family homes, plotted monthly, for 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 as well as national existing home inventory and month supply.







Below is a chart consolidating all the year-over-year changes reported by NAR in their most recent report.

Thursday, May 07, 2009

An Adjustment for All Seasons

In another great post, expert analyst Ira Artman demonstrates very clearly that although seasonal adjustment is a very powerful tool for macroeconomic analysis, it’s not a perfect science.

Ira adjusts new and existing home sales data as well as pending home sales data using a rolling 12 month sum which serves to disclose the trend in each series while avoiding some of the volatility inherent in the seasonally adjusted data.

Monday, May 04, 2009

Pending Home Sales: March 2009

Today, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) released their Pending Home Sales Report for March showing a 1.1% year-over-year increase in pending home sales nationally but a surprisingly weak 1.7% year-over-year gain in pending sales seen in the heavily foreclosure laden markets of the west region.

Meanwhile, the NARs chief economist Lawrence Yun continues to spin his foolishness calling the latest results potential “leading edge” of increased buying spurred on by government funded handouts for his industry.

“This increase could be the leading edge of first-time buyers responding to very favorable affordability conditions and an $8,000 tax credit, which increases buying power even more in areas where special programs allow buyers to use it as a downpayment,”

The following chart shows the national pending homes sales index since 2005 compared monthly. Notice that each year, the months value is decreasing fairly consistently (click for larger version).

The following chart shows the national pending home sales index along with the percent change on a year-over-year basis as well as the percent change from the peak set in 2005 (click for larger version).

Look at the Match seasonally adjusted pending home sales results and draw your own conclusion:

  • Nationally the index increased 1.1% as compared to March 2008.
  • The Northeast region declined 24.1% as compared to March 2008.
  • The Midwest region increased 8.2% as compared to March 2008.
  • The South region increased 7.7% as compared to March 2008.
  • The West region increased 1.7% as compared to March 2008.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Foreclosures, Home Sales and Profit Motive

Here are two more excellent posts by expert analyst Ira Artman.

First in “Drawn and Quartered”, Ira both illustrates the differences between seasonally adjusted, non-seasonally adjusted and annualized data series as well as giving us a better view of foreclosures relative to annualized new and existing home sales.

Next in “No News Is … No News” Ira demonstrates a startlingly cool correlation between housing turnover (total home sales / housing stock) and profit motive (annual home price change – mortgage interest rate)…. This is a particularly interesting exercise in that 5 data series are leveraged to build a correlation between two concepts that we would generally assume to be true but SEEING (the data) IS BELIEVING! Bravo Ira!

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

New Residential Construction Report: October 2008

Today’s New Residential Construction Report continues to firmly demonstrate the intensity and completeness of the washout conditions that now exist in the nation’s housing markets particularly for new residential construction showing tremendous declines on both a peak and year-over-year basis to single family permits both nationally and across every region.

Single family housing permits, the most leading of indicators, again suggests extensive weakness in future construction activity dropping 43.28% nationally as compared to October 2007 and an astonishing 71.12% since the peak in January 2005.

Moreover, every region showed significant double digit declines to permits with the Northeast declining 39.5%, the Midwest declining 37.6%, the South declining 42.9%, and the West declining a stunning 49.7% on a year-over-year basis.

Keep in mind that these declines are coming on the back of last year’s record declines.

To illustrate the extent to which permits and starts have declined, I have created the following charts (click for larger versions) that show the percentage changes of the current values on a year-over-year basis as well as compared to the peak year of 2004.

Declines to single family permits have contracted measurably in terms of monthly YOY declines, and the fact that we are now seeing declines of roughly 30%-50% on the back of 2006 and 2007 declines should provide a an unequivocal indication that the housing markets are by no means stabilizing.






Here are the seasonally adjusted statistics outlined in today’s report:

Housing Permits

Nationally

  • Single family housing permits down 43.3% as compared to October 2007.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing down 39.5% as compared to October 2007.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing permits down 37.6% as compared to October 2007.
  • For the South, single family housing permits down 42.9% compared to October 2007.
  • For the West, single family housing permits down 49.7% as compared to October 2007.
Housing Starts

Nationally

  • Single family housing starts down 39.9% as compared to October 2007.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing starts down 40.6% as compared to October 2007.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing starts down 42.9% as compared to October 2007.
  • For the South, single family housing starts down 40.6% as compared to October 2007.
  • For the West, single family housing starts down 35.1% as compared to October 2007.
Housing Completions

Nationally

  • Single family housing completions down 32.9% as compared to October 2007.
Regionally

  • For the Northeast, single family housing completions down 50.4% as compared to October 2007.
  • For the Midwest, single family housing completions down 19.4% as compared to October 2007.
  • For the South, single family housing completions down 34.5% as compared to October 2007.
  • For the West, single family housing completions down 29% as compared to October 2007.
Keep in mind that this particular report does NOT factor in the cancellations that have been widely reported to be occurring in new construction.

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Existing Home Sales Report: May 2008

Today, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) released their Existing Home Sales Report for May further confirming, perfectly clearly, the tremendous weakness in the demand of existing residential real estate with both single family homes and condos declining uniformly across the nation’s housing markets while inventory and supply remained elevated.

Although this continued falloff in demand is mostly as a result of the momentous and ongoing structural changes taking place in the credit-mortgage markets, consumer sentiment surveys are continuing to indicate that consumers are materially feeling the current stagflationary trends which will likely result in even further significant sales declines to come.

Furthermore, we are continuing to see SOLID declines to the median sales price for both single family homes and condos across virtually every region with the most notable occurring in the West showing a decline of 16.8% to the median single family home sales price and a decline of 11.8% to the median condo price.

As usual, the NAR leadership continues spinning the results all the while turning to Washington DC for additional handouts.

NAR senior economist Lawrence Yun suggests that although the market is “fragile” a home buyer tax credit and permanently higher GSE loan limits will get the “housing engine humming”.

“Keep in mind that the volume of home sales is the primary driver of economic activity that is tied to housing, … It’d be premature to say the improvement marks a turnaround. The market is fragile, so a first-time home buyer tax credit and a permanent raise in loan limits would be important steps to get the housing engine humming.”

Meanwhile, NAR president Dick Gaylord continues to spin his yarn that a home is a vehicle for wealth creation:

“Home buyers are starting to get off the fence and into the market, drawn by drops in home prices in many areas and armed with greater access to affordable mortgages, … Today’s buyer plans to stay in a home for 10 years, which is a good strategy for building long-term wealth.”

Too bad for the Realtors though since lending standards will only get more restrictive as lenders further realize losses from subprime, alt-a, prime Jumbo and even prime conforming loans.

The era of FICO driven “slam-dunk” lending is coming to a close and with it will inevitably go all the absurdities leaving borrowers and the real estate industry, if they are lucky, to simply operate in an environment of the traditional “rule of thumb” requirements of substantial down-payments and sensible earnings to debt ratios.

The latest report provides, yet again, truly stark and total confirmation that the nation’s housing markets are declining dramatically with EVERY region showing significant double digit declines to sales of BOTH single family and condos as well as increases to inventory and an unusually elevated monthly supply resulting of the collapsing pace of sales.

Keep in mind that these declines are coming “on the back” of TWO SOLID YEARS of dramatic declines further indicating that the housing markets are truly in the process of a tremendous correction.

The following (click for larger versions) are charts showing sales for single family homes, plotted monthly, for 2006, 2007 and 2008 as well as national existing home inventory and month supply.







Below is a chart consolidating all the year-over-year changes reported by NAR in their most recent report.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

New Home Sales: January 2008

Today, the U.S. Census Department released its monthly New Residential Home Sales Report for January showing continued deterioration of the already hideous falloff in demand for new residential homes both nationally and in every region resulting in an astounding median sales price drop of 15.09%.

On a year-over-year basis new home sales are continuing to weaken, dropping a truly ugly 33.9% below the sales activity seen in January 2007 and plunging a whopping 56.67% since the peak set in July 2005.

It’s important to keep in mind that these declines are coming on the back of the significant declines seen in 2006 and 2007 further indicating the significance of the housing bust.

Additionally, although inventories of unsold homes have been dropping for ten straight months, the sales volume has been declining so significantly that the supply has now reached a new peak value of 9.9 months of supply.

The following charts show the extent of sales declines seen since 2005 as well as illustrating how the further declines in 2008 are coming on top of the 2006 and 2007 results (click for larger versions)


Look at the following summary of today’s report:

National

  • The median price for a new home was down 15.09% as compared to January 2007.
  • New home sales were down 33.9% as compared to January 2007.
  • The inventory of new homes for sale declined 10.1% as compared to January 2007.
  • The number of months’ supply of the new homes has increased 37.5% as compared to January 2007 and now stands at 9.9 months.
Regional

  • In the Northeast, new home sales were down 16.1% as compared to January 2007.
  • In the Midwest, new home sales were down 56.0% as compared to January 2007.
  • In the South, new home sales were down 34.8% as compared to January 2007.
  • In the West, new home sales were down 10.1% as compared to January 2007.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

The Arlington Artifice: October 2007


This recurring monthly post tracks the latest results of the housing market seen in Arlington Massachusetts.

I choose Arlington as a result of the Boston Globe’s recently published and absurdly anecdotal and ludicrous farce about the town’s “hot” housing market.

The ridiculous tone and outright mishandling of the housing data by the Boston Globe “reporter” would almost be comical if it weren’t for the fact that the Globe’s editor, Martin Baron, ALSO blundered seriously when he responded to my email about the discrepancies.

Baron attempted to justify the articles contents and in so doing, he disclosed his poor and obviously unsophisticated abilities with even the most basic economic data.

October’s results again confirm that Arlington is by no means a “stand out” amongst its neighboring towns as Baron suggested in his email and, in fact, is following along on a path wholly consistent with the trend seen in the county, state, region and nation.

Why would an editor of a nationally recognized newspaper think that a single town would continue to function as an isolated bubble amongst a backdrop of the most significant nationwide housing recession since the Great Depression?

There are only three possible answers.

Either Baron...

(A) is a foolish and incompetent editor incapable of basic economic analysis
(B) likes ad revenues more than he likes to report the truth
(C) both A and B

I favor C.

Sadly, I have now had this very article cited to me, even by complete strangers, on at least eight occasions.

Most recently, an 80 year old local architect who should have known better given his many years of experience with numerous past downturns, but who had unfortunately placed too much trust in a newspaper that now essentially publishes propaganda, recounted the article and its numerous "facts" about Arlington's booming housing market.

Additionally, in a truly grotesque but not altogether surprising turn of events, Realtors in Arlington are now handing out copies of this article (view hideous exhibit A and B below!) during open houses in yet another shameless attempt to bamboozle buyers into confidence and activity.



October’s raw results (as reported by The Warren Group) show us the following for Arlington.

  • Monthly median home sales price of $459,000.
  • Year-to-Date median home sales price of $466,000, the lowest value since 2003.
  • Monthly home sales count of 19.
  • Year-to-Date home sales count of 289, a result on par with 2006 and 2005.
As I had shown in my prior post, this data when charted and compared to other towns in the region proves there are absolutely no grounds to call Arlington’s market exceptional.

The following chart (click for much larger version) shows how Arlington’s median sales price has changed since 1988, the first year the data was tracked by the Warren Group. Notice that while the current monthly result is clearly the most jagged and volatile measure, all three (monthly, year-to-date, and annual) measures are essentially saying the same thing, namely median prices are going down.

The next chart (click for much larger version) shows that home sales in Arlington have been essentially flat during the last 15 years, a result that is generally to be expected when looking only at the sales of one town in isolation.

The final chart shows how the year-to-date median sales price for Arlington, Bedford, Belmont, Cambridge and Lexington has changed since 1988. Notice that each town is essentially staying on the same track having made great strides during the boom and now firmly headed lower.

In review, the data shows that there is nothing exceptional about Arlington’s housing market proving clearly that the claims made in the Boston Globe article and later endorsed by its editor Martin Baron were entirely erroneous.

Please let editor Baron know what you think of this misstep.