Goin’ Down Slow: Confidence and Economy January 2007
I’ve decided to roll the Reuters/University of Michigan Survey of Consumers, The Conference Board’s Index of CEO Confidence and The Conference Board’s Index of Leading Economic indicators into a combined post that will run twice monthly as preliminary data is firmed.These three indicators should disclose a clear picture of both the overall sense of confidence (or lack thereof) on the part of consumers and businesses as well the overall trend of economic circumstances.
Today’s preliminary release of the Reuters/University of Michigan Survey of Consumers for January showed a surprise uptick to 80.5 from 75.5 in December but remaining near the lowest levels seen since the early 1990’s.
The Index of Consumer Sentiment fell 16.92% as compared to January 2007 mostly as a result of consumers’ expectations of future economic prospects.
The Index of Consumer Expectations (a component of the Index of Leading Economic Indicators) fell a whopping 21.12% below the result seen in January 2007.
As for the current circumstances, the Current Economic Conditions Index fell 11.86% as compared to the result seen in January 2007.
As you can see from the chart below (click for larger), the consumer sentiment data is a pretty good indicator of recessions leaving the recent declines possibly foretelling rough times ahead.
It’s important to note that on every instance that the CEO “current economic conditions” index dropped below a level of 40, the economy was either in recession or very near.
It’s important to note that a year-over-year decline greater than .5% has preceded every recession that has occurred in the last 59 years.
Labels: Bernanke, economy recession, Federal Reserve, housing bubble
Copyright © 2009
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer








1 Comments:
There's a couple of little nuggets in these graphs. For example, it appears that expectation indexes pretty much reflect current conditions and not the future like they're designed to. And consumers are apparently always overly pessimistic about the state of the economy, while CEOs are more realistic.
When you think about it, all recessions are different. The long 1980-83 recession was brought on intentionally to break inflation. The govt didn't try to stop it.
The 1990 recession was sort of a surprise, and Bush41 was worried about debt (and Perot) and didn't react strongly. It cost him the election even though it was over by the time of the vote.
The 2001 dot-com recession was sharp and mostly affected the coasts. Bush43 was just starting his presidency and didn't have a lot of incentive to mitigate. It was politically useful, easy to blame on Clinton and an excuse to cut taxes.
Bush43 is worried about the 2008 recession tho. He will take the blame and the Dems will gain votes from it. So Bush43 will try to shift blame by proposing more tax cuts and debt which Congress will never pass. The Dem Congress will have stimulus plans of its own, which will provide political cover especially if they are vetoed.
The thing about the 2008 recession is that it has several causes, each of which is probably worth a recession on its own. The debt/banking crises, the deflating housing bubble, foreign exchange rates, and oil prices are all serious shocks. Longer term problems like Iraq, China, social security, health care, business ethics, and wealth disparity are not helping.
By
Dagger, at 4:43 PM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home