Paper Economy - A US Real Estate Bubble Blog

Thursday, May 01, 2008

The Arlington Artifice: March 2008

This recurring monthly post tracks the latest results of the housing market seen in Arlington Massachusetts.

I choose Arlington as a result of the Boston Globe’s recently published and absurdly anecdotal and ludicrous farce about the town’s “hot” housing market.

The ridiculous tone and outright mishandling of the housing data by the Boston Globe “reporter” would almost be comical if it weren’t for the fact that the Globe’s editor, Martin Baron, ALSO blundered seriously when he responded to my email about the discrepancies.

Baron attempted to justify the articles contents and in so doing, he disclosed his disgracefully poor and obviously unsophisticated abilities with even the most basic economic data.

The March results again confirm that Arlington is by no means a “stand out” amongst its neighboring towns as Baron suggested in his email and, in fact, is following along on a path wholly consistent with the trend seen in the county, state, region and nation.

Why would an editor of a nationally recognized newspaper think that a single town would continue to function as an isolated bubble amongst a backdrop of the most significant nationwide housing recession since the Great Depression?

As I have shown in my prior posts, this data when charted and compared to other towns in the region proves there are absolutely no grounds to call Arlington’s market exceptional.

The most notable feature of the March results is unquestionably the low number of home sales with only 15 sales in March and 36 sales for the entire year to date, the lowest readings since the recessionary period of 1991.

Another important point to remember is that when sales decline dramatically the median selling price can jump wildly up or down since the small number of sales provides a small set with which to determine the “middle” selling price.

For example, for March the Cambridge median selling price of a single family home fell substantially, resting just a few thousand dollars above the median single family selling price for Arlington, an obvious distortion.

The following chart (click for much larger version) shows a history of Arlington’s March median sales price since 1988 along with the annual outcome. Notice first that although the latest result spiked up to a high of $540,000, the low sales count is clearly impacting the median selling price and March may end up being a little misleading as home sales pick up later this spring.

The next chart (click for much larger version) shows that home sales in Arlington have been essentially flat during the last 15 years, a result that is generally to be expected when looking only at the sales of one town in isolation. That being said though, Arlington has seen only 36 home sales this year, the lowest result on record since 1991.

The final chart shows how the year-to-date median sales price and combined sale count for Arlington, Bedford, Belmont, Cambridge and Lexington has changed since 1988. Notice again that the one month median price data is very volatile jumping radically up or down for each of town.

In review, the data shows that there is nothing exceptional about Arlington’s housing market proving clearly that the claims made in the Boston Globe article and later endorsed by its editor Martin Baron were entirely erroneous.

Labels: , , , ,

Copyright © 2009
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer

15 Comments:

  • What are the prices in Sommerville, Medford, and Winchester doing? They border Arlington right?

    By Anonymous Dagger, at 3:09 PM  

  • Dagger,

    I should add them to the mix but all the towns are doing the same thing... slowing sales, median prices jumping all over the place, virtually everything selling under list.

    They are all acting the same but in their respective tracks... Medford is a bit worse off than arlington which is a bit worse off than lexington.

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 3:14 PM  

  • Arlington makes startling comback!

    So much for your gloom and doom, Arlington has one of the lowest inventories of properties in the state. Only a scant 3 months supply based on April sales figures (132 properties, April sales of 43).

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:29 AM  

  • Realtor,

    Hate to break it to you (you know already anyhow) but the low inventory is not a function of a good sales pace, its a result of homeowners inability or unwillingness to sell in such a lousy market.

    At this point year-to-date sales in Arlington have declined to levels not seen since the 1991 housing recession and almost all single family homes in are selling below list (in the Fall of 2007 roughly 30% were still selling over list)... its a buyers market and you bottom feeders are dividing up a quickly shrinking number of sales.

    Good luck slithering around the filth!

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 11:47 AM  

  • "result of homeowners inability or unwillingness to sell in such a lousy market"

    Baloney, those who put their homes on the market sell (as Aprils's figures show)...

    Almost all the properties sold above assessed value, which for you tin hat folk is based on 2006 sales prices.

    Here's the last sale of the month:

    90 Jason st, purchased in 2000 for 648,000. Sold this month for 951,400 at 30k above assessment...yeah it's tough out there...

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 12:52 PM  

  • Realtor,

    90 Jason street was on the market for most of 2007 with no takers... (not typical for that area of Arlington) they pulled it off during the holidays (as you thief's are known to do) and then re-listed it this spring.

    That served to lure in a buyer (who was likely stalking the property) who paid nearly $50,000 under the asking price.

    Is that your best example of the "hot" Arlington?

    Again, for the 16 single family homes sold in April, 11 sold under list and 2 sold at list...

    Most of these homes have had price reductions as well.

    Again, good luck scraping around the bottom and splitting meager commissions with other backstabbing loser Realtor middlemen.

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 1:22 PM  

  • SATT,

    I don't understand your fascination with list price. Maybe you pay MSRP for a car, I don't. The listing price is a starting point for negotiation. I am sure the owner of 80 Jason was not broken up about getting "only" 95% of his listing/wish price. He earned over 300k for the living the house for eight short years..

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:46 PM  

  • Why is this so difficult... the market in Arlington is SLOW... just as slow as the whole surrounding Boston area... When homes sell they are selling under list....

    What more is there to say...

    The point of the post was to dispute the claim by the Boston Globe that while surrounding towns suffered through the downturn, Arlington was having a "Boom" all by itself...

    The article was absurd and continuing to assert that Arlington's housing market is hot is just more of the same.

    What is so hard to accept... homes are selling SLOWLY in the Boston area ... as they are on the rest of the east cost, west cost and all areas in between.

    The housing boom is over... face the reality it is over...

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 2:50 PM  

  • Great job on the analysis of Arlington.

    Your critics can fathom that the next down leg in real estate will be to give back a portion of the gains from 1999-2002. Any home purchased in Arlington or anywhere (for the most case) in mid 1999 to early to Mid 2000 saw a 30%-40% increase in value.

    Your critics also aren't wise enough to know there are safer investments than a 70-80 year old home - that needs to be painted and have taxes paid and sucks up your time/money like a giant vacuum!

    The $64,000 question will we break through the Price levels of 1999-2002 Owners?

    Keep up the good work.

    By Anonymous Former Arlington Owner, at 3:19 PM  

  • former Arlington owner,

    Thanks for the good words... I think homes in the Boston area are going to re-test the 1999 price levels.

    There was enough growth between 1997 and June of 2000 to have satisfied a normal appreciation for the whole of the last decade.

    My estimates have prices bottoming out sometime between 2011 and 2012 so I think re-testing 1999 - 2000 prices is pretty conservative.

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 3:53 PM  

  • There is no way the owner of 90 Jason "earned" 300K for owning the house eight years. First there is the lovely real estate commission - minus 6% . That is 894K-648 = 246. Then there is the little matter of 10,000 per year in real estate taxes, and probably a like amount on maintenance and insurance = 160,000. Now his profit is 86,000. Consider that he could have made a conservative 8% in the stock market with his downpayment, or 93K in profit after taxes. Does this investment still seem like a good idea? And this isn't even counting the 226,000 he paid in interest over 8 years.

    Pretty house though.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:27 PM  

  • anon,

    Great point.. its easy to forget that a house comes with serious carrying costs which dramatically impact the ROI if your inclined to look at it that way.

    Along those lines, one thing that always amazes me is how the mortgage and finance industry together with the govt has somehow convinced Americans that the mortgage interest deduction actually justifies getting yourself deep in mortgage debt.

    I have had many people tell me that they "need" the big mortgage in order to use the interest deduction to offset their high income.

    When I ask them if it makes sense to actually spend $1 to save 30 cents they just stare blankly.

    I think at this point Americans are completely incapable of understanding basic finance like how to value a home or how to simply manage their own debt.

    They just look at the monthly cost and if they can handle the payments for now... more debt!

    That brings me to another point... I had a good idea (I think) for a product to sell to these suckers... it's like a mortgage but its for your entire life.

    So instead of paying for food, fuel, clothing and other durable products and services (even stocks) out of your salary you get massive loan for all of it.

    So, you finance all your spending for all your needs for your entire life... every penny.

    This way, you can essentially have everything you want now... so long as you can afford the monthly cost (they could garnish your wages or hit you with penalties if you miss payments.. all recourse terms of course) and in return you live you life in total debt servitude.

    If you can get the govt in on the game then they could offer tax incentive on the interest paid and possibly even sponsor the process through GSE securitization.

    I suppose the existing HELOC and massive mortgage debt is essentially what I have just described but I think there is definitely a HUGE market for explicit and willing debt servitude.

    By Blogger SoldAtTheTop, at 5:15 PM  

  • "Consider that he could have made a conservative 8% in the stock market with his downpayment"

    Wrong...

    S&P 500 is up just 1.3% over the last ten years, factoring in inflation and dividends.

    " Now his profit is 86,000"

    How much profit did you make on the rent you paid?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:08 PM  

  • And another thing;

    "And this isn't even counting the 226,000 he paid in interest over 8 years."

    And you are not including the 288,000 saved on rent(96 x 3000), or his tax savings...

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:20 PM  

  • May 2008 S&P500 = 1,413.90
    May 1998 S&P500 = 1,090.82
    29.6% increase which according to Yahoo includes dividends http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=%5EGSPC&a=00&b=3&c=1998&d=04&e=5&f=2008&g=m&z=66&y=0

    If you want to adjust for inflation, you also need to adjust for inflation in the profits calculated on the property in question. However, this is mostly pointless as inflation is the same no matter the source of your profit...

    The rent you paid was the interest, mainenance, landscaping, water, insurance, property tax, snow removal, etc, that I don't pay as a renter and stock investor.

    By Anonymous Jon@Capitalistmaven.com, at 9:24 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


 
Top Real Estate Blogs Top Real Estate Blogs Blogarama - The Blog Directory Check Google Page Rank