The Arlington Artifice: February 2008
This recurring monthly post tracks the latest results of the housing market seen in Arlington Massachusetts.I choose Arlington as a result of the Boston Globe’s recently published and absurdly anecdotal and ludicrous farce about the town’s “hot” housing market.
The ridiculous tone and outright mishandling of the housing data by the Boston Globe “reporter” would almost be comical if it weren’t for the fact that the Globe’s editor, Martin Baron, ALSO blundered seriously when he responded to my email about the discrepancies.
Baron attempted to justify the articles contents and in so doing, he disclosed his disgracefully poor and obviously unsophisticated abilities with even the most basic economic data.
The February results again confirm that Arlington is by no means a “stand out” amongst its neighboring towns as Baron suggested in his email and, in fact, is following along on a path wholly consistent with the trend seen in the county, state, region and nation.
Why would an editor of a nationally recognized newspaper think that a single town would continue to function as an isolated bubble amongst a backdrop of the most significant nationwide housing recession since the Great Depression?
As I had shown in my prior posts, this data when charted and compared to other towns in the region proves there are absolutely no grounds to call Arlington’s market exceptional.
The most notable feature of the February results is unquestionably the low number of home sales with only nine sales this month and twenty one sales for January and February combined, the lowest readings since the recessionary period of 1991.
Another important point to remember is that when sales decline dramatically the median selling price can jump wildly up or down since the smaller number of sales provides a smaller set with which to determine the “middle” sale price.
The following chart (click for much larger version) shows a history of Arlington’s February median sales price since 1988 along with the annual outcome. Notice that although the latest result spiked up to a high of $526,000, the low sales count is clearly impacting the median price and February may end up being a little misleading as home sales pick up later this spring.
Please let editor Baron know what you think of this misstep.
Labels: arlington, Bernanke, boston, boston globe, economy recession, housing bubble, martin baron
Copyright © 2009
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer
PaperEconomy Blog - www.papereconomy.com
All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer








21 Comments:
FYI Sales in March have tripled over February ,leaving less than a five month supply of properties for sale in Arlington...
By
Anonymous, at 3:20 PM
Anonymous, where are you getting your March sales data from? The Registry of Deeds has 62 Arlington deeds listed for March so far - they also have exactly 62 listed for February. I didn't go through to filter out condos and the various transactions that The Warren Group excludes (like family transfers), so maybe the total number of single family home sales has tripled when you apply those filters and wait for all of March to be accounted for. However, the unfiltered data would suggest sales were close to flat, so I'm curious how you arrived at the tripling?
By
bostonbubble, at 3:48 PM
Oh really?
So thats why the same 35-40 single family homes have been on the market for months now.
You lying Realtors are the lowest...
There have only been 10 single family homes sold in March... thats it 10... not tripled... 10...
If sales had tripled in just March there would be no inventory... There are only 35 - 40 singles currently on the market in Arlington.
Good job... might want to check your math.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 3:48 PM
That last message was in response to anonymous of 3:20... not bostonbubble who is right on as usual.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 3:50 PM
Bostonbubble,
I included condo and multi-family sales in my data. You're are correct that there where 62 deeds in March. I filtered out name changes and came up with 27 sales for the month.According to Ziprealty there are 118 SFH, MFH and condos now listed for sale, if you use 27 sales per month as a base there are about five months of inventory for sale....
By
Anonymous, at 5:40 PM
So anon,
Where did you get the "FYI Sales in March have tripled over February" from?
How did you interpret sales tripling?
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 7:45 PM
Soldatthetop,
"How did you interpret sales tripling?"
Simple, I included sales of condos and multi-family homes (27 vs. 9). BB stated "The most notable feature of the February results is unquestionably the low number of home sales with only nine sales this month" he didn't qualify "home sales" as "single family homes sales". If you triple nine what do you get?....
By
Anonymous, at 8:08 PM
BB stated "The most notable feature of the February results is unquestionably the low number of home sales with only nine sales this month" he didn't qualify "home sales" as "single family homes sales".
Actually, that wasn't me - SoldAtTheTop wrote the article.
The chart which shows the volume of sales does actually qualify the volume as being for single family homes.
By
bostonbubble, at 8:16 PM
I used to just think we should let relitters go back to being baristas. Now I think we should use them to supplement the food supply.
Highest and best use, and all that.
In any case, I think the real story is Binya Applebaum's blog. He's clearly holding a hard line that 1) we've reached the bottom and 2) the crash won't hurt neighborhoods we like. Pure relitter BS.
I'd like to see this sophisticated study he keeps talking about--the one that excludes all the towns that don't prove his point.
By
SoldAtThePeak, at 8:52 PM
anon,
That's ridiculous...
First of all the post (as is true with most of this blog) only ever dealt with single family homes which was obvious.
Apparently you bright enough to determine on you own the number of residential sales (condo, multi and single) for March but then interpreted my citing of 9 sales for February as the total of all condo, multi and single?
Sorry I don't buy that...
So sales didn't triple did they?
You, like all other Realtors, just got the numbers wrong.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 9:00 PM
SoldAtThePeak,
I agree about the Boston.com blog... they don't handle the data very well but I do think the S&P/Case-Shiller tiered index for Boston shows that higher priced homes have not corrected nearly as much (as a percentage) as lower priced homes... the only problem is that says nothing going forward.
The only thing it tells me is that people on the higher end have yet to be really impacted by the current downturn.
But we are only getting warmed up... maybe we are through the first few of innings at most.
What I think will be immensely interesting is the social implications of the unwind as it really cuts through to the bone of the middle-upper income households.
No one bats an eye when folks in the more moderate income areas take a beating and get foreclosed on but it will be very stressful for communities and obviously fairly embarrassing for individuals if/when we see a wave of foreclosures hitting middle-upper income households.
It may take some time but if the jobs vanish, people will only be able to hang on so long.
Eventually they will arrive at the same conclusion that the less well-to-do arrived at in 2006-2007,
financially it just better to walk away.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 9:25 PM
soldatthetop,
My mistake, didn't realize this was a single family blog. Cherry pick the data all you like, you can't escape the facts, at the present sales rate Arlington has less than 5 months "housing" inventory. Funny you didn't comment on that stat, what, didn't fit your agenda?
By
Anonymous, at 9:57 PM
anon realtor,
The data wasn't cherry picked and remember it was you making the claim that sales had "tripled"...
And as for the sales pace, we still have at least 3 more months to build inventory so I wouldn't get too confident with your 5 months of supply.
Good luck scraping bottom.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 10:29 PM
"Notice that although the latest result spiked up to a high of $526,000, the low sales count is clearly impacting the median price and February may end up being a little misleading as home sales pick up later this spring."
I see, so the UP trend is "misleading". Thanks for clearing that up.
By
Anonymous, at 8:04 AM
I see, so the UP trend is "misleading". Thanks for clearing that up.
I would agree with you that the decrease in months of inventory is noteworthy, but calling it an "UP trend" is iffy. Sales are way down. Normally that would drive months of inventory way up, but as you point out it is actually low now. This is because the number of homes listed for sale is abnormally low. Is that a positive sign for those who sell for a living? Maybe. It would help to know why the number of properties for sale is so abnormally low and whether that trend will continue into the peak spring selling season, which is about to start.
By
bostonbubble, at 8:50 AM
anon,
You realtors are like talking to a wall.. let me try again.
Looking at the median selling price for a single town or even a subset of towns when sales are so low (remember we are seeing historically low sales this year) is very dubious.
To keep things simple for you answer this... How well do you think a town like Arlington's single family housing-stock value is represented by just 9 sales?
That's exactly how the median is calculated... take the 9 sales, order them from highest to lowest and pick out the one nearest the middle.
The point is simple and I made it very clear in the post... wait till later this year when there are far more sales then look at the year-to-date median (based on the collection of all homes sold from the start from the year) and it will offer better clarity.
Again... good luck scratching at the bottom.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 10:35 AM
Hello,
I have a general, possibly naive, question about the Arlington data: what made the prices go up so dramatically in the early 2000's? The fact that the number of sales was roughly flat suggests that there was not a huge increase in demand.
By
Sam, at 7:20 PM
Here's a relevant data point: The chief economist for Freddie Mac says Boston leads the nation in days on market--61--second only to Miami at 65.
That speaks volumes.
By
soldAtThePeak, at 8:18 PM
Sorry--I meant 61 extra days on market compared to 2005.
By
SoldAtThePeak, at 8:20 PM
Sam,
No... the problem was that there was a HUGE demand especially from buyers with lots of borrowed cash (even borrowing the deposits).
You have to keep in mind that for a town like Arlington to have a notable increase in sales (as occurred prior to 1999 and to a lessor extent after) things have to be very hot.
There are not a lot of new single family homes (some though) being built in the town and existing homeowners flowing out of the town shouldn't be expected to rise or fall notably.
So sales kind of bounce around and if the market is very hot they climb but you can only unseat so many local homeowners.
So price appreciation was dramatic partly because of supply staying somewhat fixed and a HUGE increase in the amount of borrowed money that was available to buyers.
New buyers were effectively created out of thin air as lending standards allowing virtually anyone borrow and buy whatever they wanted.
I remember going to many open houses where the realtors were taking offers right on the spot... insane bidding wars ensued on virtually every home... it was a frenzy.
So there were lots of dollars (WAY too many) chasing too few homes = Housing BOOM!
Now though things have reversed.
By
SoldAtTheTop, at 8:22 PM
Rent control ended in Cambridge in 1997 (and Boston & Brooline). Many rent controlled appartment dwellers purchased housing in Arlington after their rents reset to market rates. This accounts for much of the increased demand for housing in Arlington in the late 1990's and early 2000's.
By
Anonymous, at 9:58 AM
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home